Abstract
In this article are analysed reasons of violence for women in the family: the influence of patriarchalism model, poverty, the view for woman in the contect of history, depresion, discord and conflicts between members of family. On the ground of G. D. Myers, J. Gilligan, P. L. Berger, A. M. Pavilionienė, K. Miškinis and other authors ideas, there are explained origin of violence for women, the whole of values, traditions, customs, habits and attitudes what have influence for inequality of sex. In the modern society the role of woman is very depreciated, because the women are sold to slavery, they are beat, killed.
The results of investigation proved, that women conflict and cross with their husbands, because they drink hard, humiliate wives, don’t agree for education of children, for poverty in their family. Husbands attach a little attention for their wives. They don’t like, that wives don’t take care for them. Women difficulty experience the violence, they feel strain and fear, hatred and humiliation.
Some women aren’t independent and confident, because they married with that man who harmed woman before wedding. Women complain to friends, neighbours, relatives about violence from husband, but only some women inform for police. The facts aren’t solved, because the women forgive for their violenctions, live with them and suffer.
The sociological investigations are the best ilustration of fact, that the women are depended on economy conditions in the family. This depending is connected with physical violence. In this article are explained prevention possibilities (the Women crisis centres, psichology services, ungovernment organizations). Its are explained some standpoints about punishments for thees, who beats and harms women. There are some ideas from Criminal Code of Lithuanian Republic and UNIFEM organization about the violence for women. The author of this article thinks, that the society has to know about problems in the families.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Olga L. Dubovik,
Criminal Environmental Policy: the Moscow Authorities Practice
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 20 (2007): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Artūras Tereškinas,
Ieva Dryžaitė,
Working-Class Men and Social Suffering in Contemporary Lithuania
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 25 (2009): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Rasa Baločkaitė,
Postmodern Episteme of Power and its Outlines in Public Discourse in Lithuania
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 15 (2005): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Mantas Dirgėla,
The Preconditions of Rebirth of Serbian and Croatian Nationalism in the of the XX century
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 2 No. 2 (1998): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Algimantas Valantiejus,
In Search for the Links Between History and Sociology
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 7 No. 1-2 (2001): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Arūnas Poviliūnas,
Must the Social be Reassembled? Broken Dispute between B. Latour and P. Bourdieu
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2020): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Florian Znaniecki,
The Spread of National Consiousness and Solidarity
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 2 No. 2 (1998): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Aldis Gedutis,
User's Manual: How to Demonstrate Liberal Humanism without Falling into a Trap of Genealogy
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 17 (2006): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Gražina Matulienė,
Students’ Viewpoint to the Environment and Health
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 12 (2003): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Zenonas Norkus,
On the Millennial American Empire as the End of History
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 41 No. 2 (2017): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas