Abstract
In this article are analysed reasons of violence for women in the family: the influence of patriarchalism model, poverty, the view for woman in the contect of history, depresion, discord and conflicts between members of family. On the ground of G. D. Myers, J. Gilligan, P. L. Berger, A. M. Pavilionienė, K. Miškinis and other authors ideas, there are explained origin of violence for women, the whole of values, traditions, customs, habits and attitudes what have influence for inequality of sex. In the modern society the role of woman is very depreciated, because the women are sold to slavery, they are beat, killed.
The results of investigation proved, that women conflict and cross with their husbands, because they drink hard, humiliate wives, don’t agree for education of children, for poverty in their family. Husbands attach a little attention for their wives. They don’t like, that wives don’t take care for them. Women difficulty experience the violence, they feel strain and fear, hatred and humiliation.
Some women aren’t independent and confident, because they married with that man who harmed woman before wedding. Women complain to friends, neighbours, relatives about violence from husband, but only some women inform for police. The facts aren’t solved, because the women forgive for their violenctions, live with them and suffer.
The sociological investigations are the best ilustration of fact, that the women are depended on economy conditions in the family. This depending is connected with physical violence. In this article are explained prevention possibilities (the Women crisis centres, psichology services, ungovernment organizations). Its are explained some standpoints about punishments for thees, who beats and harms women. There are some ideas from Criminal Code of Lithuanian Republic and UNIFEM organization about the violence for women. The author of this article thinks, that the society has to know about problems in the families.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Neringa Klumbytė,
Political Exclusion and Bipolar Structures of Historical Justice. Memories of WWII among Lithuanian Russian-Speakers in the Context of the Politics of History in Lithuania and Russia
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 41 No. 2 (2017): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Vaidutis Laurėnas,
A Societal Need for a Social Critique
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 1 No. 1 (1997): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Irma Matonytė,
In Search of the Elite and Elitology
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: No. 1-2 (2000): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Tuomo Mörä,
Ideals of European Public Sphere and EU Journalism
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 23 (2008): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Artūras Tereškinas,
Between Soup and Soap: Iconic Nationality, Mass Media and Pop Culture in Contemporary Lithuania
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 5 No. 3 (1999): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Viktorija Žilinskaitė,
Sociology on the Move in the Researchscapes. Theory and Empirics in XVII ISA World Congress of Sociology
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 26 (2010): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Liutauras Kraniauskas,
Sociology of Ant Colonies and their Etnomyrmecology
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 27 (2010): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Ainė Ramonaitė,
Effects of Strong and Weak Ties in Protest Mobilisation: the Genesis and Development of Sąjūdis, 1987–1988
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 29 No. 2 (2011): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Tomas Sodeika,
On Martin Buber and His Sociology of Religion: Curriculum Vitae, Interhumanity, "Inter"
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 2 No. 2 (1998): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Aldis Gedutis,
The Games of Social Bonds
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 1 No. 1 (1997): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas