Abstract
In this article are analysed reasons of violence for women in the family: the influence of patriarchalism model, poverty, the view for woman in the contect of history, depresion, discord and conflicts between members of family. On the ground of G. D. Myers, J. Gilligan, P. L. Berger, A. M. Pavilionienė, K. Miškinis and other authors ideas, there are explained origin of violence for women, the whole of values, traditions, customs, habits and attitudes what have influence for inequality of sex. In the modern society the role of woman is very depreciated, because the women are sold to slavery, they are beat, killed.
The results of investigation proved, that women conflict and cross with their husbands, because they drink hard, humiliate wives, don’t agree for education of children, for poverty in their family. Husbands attach a little attention for their wives. They don’t like, that wives don’t take care for them. Women difficulty experience the violence, they feel strain and fear, hatred and humiliation.
Some women aren’t independent and confident, because they married with that man who harmed woman before wedding. Women complain to friends, neighbours, relatives about violence from husband, but only some women inform for police. The facts aren’t solved, because the women forgive for their violenctions, live with them and suffer.
The sociological investigations are the best ilustration of fact, that the women are depended on economy conditions in the family. This depending is connected with physical violence. In this article are explained prevention possibilities (the Women crisis centres, psichology services, ungovernment organizations). Its are explained some standpoints about punishments for thees, who beats and harms women. There are some ideas from Criminal Code of Lithuanian Republic and UNIFEM organization about the violence for women. The author of this article thinks, that the society has to know about problems in the families.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Irc Ferenc,
Globalised Criminality, Local Crime Control and Prevention
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 20 (2007): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Rūta Žiliukaitė,
Risks of Civic Activity and Motivation for Civic Engagement
in Contemporary Lithuanian Societ
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 27 (2010): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Audronė Žukauskaitė,
The Other Side of Reason
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 2 No. 2 (1998): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Hannu Nieminen,
Europe of Networks or the European Public Sphere? Four plus One Approaches
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 23 (2008): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Jolita Viluckienė,
THE WHEELCHAIR AS A SIGN OF MOTOR DISABILITY: A PHENOMENOLOGICALLY GROUNDED SOCIOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 31 No. 2 (2012): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Rasa Baločkaitė,
“Unbroken Thread”: a Look into Pandora's Box by Nerija Putinaitė
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 21 (2008): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Marius Povilas Šaulauskas,
Homo Irretitus: Politicus, Faber, Ludens
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 29 No. 2 (2011): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Nijolė Strakauskaitė,
The Problem Elite's Identity of Lithuania Minor: Cultural Discourse
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 7 No. 1-2 (2001): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Zenonas Norkus,
The First Lithunian Work on Metatheory of Sociology
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 16 (2005): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Liutauras Kraniauskas,
Masters of Methodological Doubt and Their Toolbox
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 29 No. 2 (2011): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas