Abstract
In this article are analysed reasons of violence for women in the family: the influence of patriarchalism model, poverty, the view for woman in the contect of history, depresion, discord and conflicts between members of family. On the ground of G. D. Myers, J. Gilligan, P. L. Berger, A. M. Pavilionienė, K. Miškinis and other authors ideas, there are explained origin of violence for women, the whole of values, traditions, customs, habits and attitudes what have influence for inequality of sex. In the modern society the role of woman is very depreciated, because the women are sold to slavery, they are beat, killed.
The results of investigation proved, that women conflict and cross with their husbands, because they drink hard, humiliate wives, don’t agree for education of children, for poverty in their family. Husbands attach a little attention for their wives. They don’t like, that wives don’t take care for them. Women difficulty experience the violence, they feel strain and fear, hatred and humiliation.
Some women aren’t independent and confident, because they married with that man who harmed woman before wedding. Women complain to friends, neighbours, relatives about violence from husband, but only some women inform for police. The facts aren’t solved, because the women forgive for their violenctions, live with them and suffer.
The sociological investigations are the best ilustration of fact, that the women are depended on economy conditions in the family. This depending is connected with physical violence. In this article are explained prevention possibilities (the Women crisis centres, psichology services, ungovernment organizations). Its are explained some standpoints about punishments for thees, who beats and harms women. There are some ideas from Criminal Code of Lithuanian Republic and UNIFEM organization about the violence for women. The author of this article thinks, that the society has to know about problems in the families.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Marijus Jonaitis,
The Ascension of Thought and Action (Maironis' Kame Išganymas)
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 1 No. 1 (1997): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Algimantas Valantiejus,
What a Capitalism, Such a Democracy
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 21 (2008): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Algimantas Valantiejus,
Vytautas Kavolis's Historical Sociology (Methodological Aspects)
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 16 (2005): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Dovilė Trumpytė,
Made-Public Spaces
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 14 No. 3 (2004): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Irena Šutinienė,
NATIONAL MEMORY NARRATIVE IN MULTICULTURAL AREA: THE CASE OF POLES IN SOUTHEASTERN LITHUANIA
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 37 No. 2 (2015): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Vida Kanopienė,
Šeimų tyrimas žemėlapio metodu: naujas žinojimas ir kokybinio tyrimo kalbėsena
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 31 No. 2 (2012): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Karl Jaspers,
World's History
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 4 No. 2 (1999): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Lina Dabkevičiūtė,
The Theme of Violence against Children in the Daily Paper “Lietuvos rytas” (year 2002)
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 12 (2003): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Algimantas Valantiejus,
The System of Theoretical Pressupositions and Concepts in Jeffrey Alexander's Sociology. Distinctive Features of Neofunctionalism
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 3 No. 1 (1999): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Marju Lauristin,
Zenonas Norkus,
Peeter Vihalemm,
On the Sociology’s Contribution to Knowledgeof the Baltic Way
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 29 No. 2 (2011): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas