Abstract
In this article are analysed reasons of violence for women in the family: the influence of patriarchalism model, poverty, the view for woman in the contect of history, depresion, discord and conflicts between members of family. On the ground of G. D. Myers, J. Gilligan, P. L. Berger, A. M. Pavilionienė, K. Miškinis and other authors ideas, there are explained origin of violence for women, the whole of values, traditions, customs, habits and attitudes what have influence for inequality of sex. In the modern society the role of woman is very depreciated, because the women are sold to slavery, they are beat, killed.
The results of investigation proved, that women conflict and cross with their husbands, because they drink hard, humiliate wives, don’t agree for education of children, for poverty in their family. Husbands attach a little attention for their wives. They don’t like, that wives don’t take care for them. Women difficulty experience the violence, they feel strain and fear, hatred and humiliation.
Some women aren’t independent and confident, because they married with that man who harmed woman before wedding. Women complain to friends, neighbours, relatives about violence from husband, but only some women inform for police. The facts aren’t solved, because the women forgive for their violenctions, live with them and suffer.
The sociological investigations are the best ilustration of fact, that the women are depended on economy conditions in the family. This depending is connected with physical violence. In this article are explained prevention possibilities (the Women crisis centres, psichology services, ungovernment organizations). Its are explained some standpoints about punishments for thees, who beats and harms women. There are some ideas from Criminal Code of Lithuanian Republic and UNIFEM organization about the violence for women. The author of this article thinks, that the society has to know about problems in the families.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Bronius Genzelis,
Petras Leonas and the Beginnings of Sociology in Lithuania
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 5 No. 3 (1999): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Raimondas Kazlauskas,
The Idea of Europe: East and West in Greek Political Philosophy
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 4 No. 2 (1999): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Algirdas Gaižutis,
The Tasks and the Crossroads of Sociology of Art
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 1 No. 1 (1997): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Algimantas Valantiejus,
An Intersection of the Discursive post- and the Truth of Art, or Towards the Hermeneutical Deconstruction
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 13 (2004): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Arūnas Juška,
Ethno-Political Tkansformation in the States of the Former USSR
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 5 No. 3 (1999): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Rytis Bulota,
Social Stances and (Unobtrusive) Resistance in Kaunas During the Late Soviet Period
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 29 No. 2 (2011): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Krzysztof Krajewski,
Too Many Suspended Sentences? Polish or Central and Eastern European Problem?
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 20 (2007): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
A. Salem,
NIKLAS LUHMANN, OBSERVING SYSTEMS AND SOCIAL CRITIQUE
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 34 No. 1 (2014): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Vida Beresnevičiūtė,
Arūnas Poviliūnas,
Integration of Master‘s Studies Graduates into the Labour Market: Analysis of the Results of Sociological Survey
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 19 (2007): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Marijus Jonaitis,
The Ascension of Thought and Action (Maironis' Kame Išganymas)
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 1 No. 1 (1997): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas