Abstract
In this article are analysed reasons of violence for women in the family: the influence of patriarchalism model, poverty, the view for woman in the contect of history, depresion, discord and conflicts between members of family. On the ground of G. D. Myers, J. Gilligan, P. L. Berger, A. M. Pavilionienė, K. Miškinis and other authors ideas, there are explained origin of violence for women, the whole of values, traditions, customs, habits and attitudes what have influence for inequality of sex. In the modern society the role of woman is very depreciated, because the women are sold to slavery, they are beat, killed.
The results of investigation proved, that women conflict and cross with their husbands, because they drink hard, humiliate wives, don’t agree for education of children, for poverty in their family. Husbands attach a little attention for their wives. They don’t like, that wives don’t take care for them. Women difficulty experience the violence, they feel strain and fear, hatred and humiliation.
Some women aren’t independent and confident, because they married with that man who harmed woman before wedding. Women complain to friends, neighbours, relatives about violence from husband, but only some women inform for police. The facts aren’t solved, because the women forgive for their violenctions, live with them and suffer.
The sociological investigations are the best ilustration of fact, that the women are depended on economy conditions in the family. This depending is connected with physical violence. In this article are explained prevention possibilities (the Women crisis centres, psichology services, ungovernment organizations). Its are explained some standpoints about punishments for thees, who beats and harms women. There are some ideas from Criminal Code of Lithuanian Republic and UNIFEM organization about the violence for women. The author of this article thinks, that the society has to know about problems in the families.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Gary Hazeldine,
Pathologies of Recognition: Axel Honneth and the Renewed Possibility of a Critical Theory of Society
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 40 No. 1 (2017): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Antanas Katalynas,
Aesthetic Qualities and Aesthetic Judgments
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 8 No. 3-4 (2001): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Alina Žvinklienė,
Machismo: Competing Over Honor (studies of Sicilian experience)
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 15 (2005): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Aldis Gedutis,
Architektūrinės ir istorinės Klaipėdos vizijų konkurencija: drąsūs sprendimai ar darnus išsaugojimas?
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 30 No. 1 (2012): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Sigita Kraniauskienė,
Margarita Gedvilaitė-Kordušienė,
GRANDPARENTS’ CHILDCARE SUPPORT IN LITHUANIA: PREDICTORS AND CONSEQUENCES FOR WELL-BEING
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 31 No. 2 (2012): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Algimantas Valantiejus,
Harold Garfinkel and the Postphenomenology of Social Action (I)
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 28 No. 1 (2011): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Algimantas Valantiejus,
The Rules of Radical Microsiology
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 15 (2005): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Rūta Žiliukaitė,
ANALYSIS OF BLAT RELATIONS DURING THE LATE SOVIET PERIOD IN LITHUANIA
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 35 No. 2 (2014): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Raimondas Kazlauskas,
The Culture of Memory and the Genesis of the Political In Delphic Theology
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Audronė Telešienė,
Openness to immigration: a case of Lithuania in an international perspective
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 32 No. 1 (2013): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas