Abstract
In this article are analysed reasons of violence for women in the family: the influence of patriarchalism model, poverty, the view for woman in the contect of history, depresion, discord and conflicts between members of family. On the ground of G. D. Myers, J. Gilligan, P. L. Berger, A. M. Pavilionienė, K. Miškinis and other authors ideas, there are explained origin of violence for women, the whole of values, traditions, customs, habits and attitudes what have influence for inequality of sex. In the modern society the role of woman is very depreciated, because the women are sold to slavery, they are beat, killed.
The results of investigation proved, that women conflict and cross with their husbands, because they drink hard, humiliate wives, don’t agree for education of children, for poverty in their family. Husbands attach a little attention for their wives. They don’t like, that wives don’t take care for them. Women difficulty experience the violence, they feel strain and fear, hatred and humiliation.
Some women aren’t independent and confident, because they married with that man who harmed woman before wedding. Women complain to friends, neighbours, relatives about violence from husband, but only some women inform for police. The facts aren’t solved, because the women forgive for their violenctions, live with them and suffer.
The sociological investigations are the best ilustration of fact, that the women are depended on economy conditions in the family. This depending is connected with physical violence. In this article are explained prevention possibilities (the Women crisis centres, psichology services, ungovernment organizations). Its are explained some standpoints about punishments for thees, who beats and harms women. There are some ideas from Criminal Code of Lithuanian Republic and UNIFEM organization about the violence for women. The author of this article thinks, that the society has to know about problems in the families.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Zenonas Norkus,
Agrarinių reformų Pirmojoje ir Antrojoje Lietuvos respublikose lyginamoji istorinė sociologinė analizė
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 30 No. 1 (2012): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Jolita Viluckienė,
Disability as Biographical Disruption
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 26 (2010): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Leonardas Rinkevičius,
The Theory of Ecological Modernization: Central Ideas and Critical Insights
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: No. 1-2 (2000): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Algimantas Valantiejus,
The Problems of Modern Social Theories
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 10 (2002): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Giedrė Baltrušaitytė,
The Psychiatrist–Patient Relationship within the Deinstitutionalised Context of Primary Health Care
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 11 (2003): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Ramūnas Trimakas,
Lithuanian National Identity: the Problem of the Relation between Ethnicity and Confessionality in the Interwar Period in Lithuanian Republic (1918-1940)
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 5 No. 3 (1999): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Sigita Kraniauskienė,
Normative and functional intergenerational solidarity in Lithuania
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 32 No. 1 (2013): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Andrius Švarplys,
The Difficulites for European Identity: Discourse, Culture, Politics and Post-nationalism
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 22 (2008): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Algimantas Valantiejus,
Contemporary Sociological Theory (II)
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 25 (2009): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Maryja Šupa,
CULTURAL TRANSFORMATIONS OF CRITICAL CRIMINOLOGY
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 34 No. 1 (2014): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas