Abstract
In this article are analysed reasons of violence for women in the family: the influence of patriarchalism model, poverty, the view for woman in the contect of history, depresion, discord and conflicts between members of family. On the ground of G. D. Myers, J. Gilligan, P. L. Berger, A. M. Pavilionienė, K. Miškinis and other authors ideas, there are explained origin of violence for women, the whole of values, traditions, customs, habits and attitudes what have influence for inequality of sex. In the modern society the role of woman is very depreciated, because the women are sold to slavery, they are beat, killed.
The results of investigation proved, that women conflict and cross with their husbands, because they drink hard, humiliate wives, don’t agree for education of children, for poverty in their family. Husbands attach a little attention for their wives. They don’t like, that wives don’t take care for them. Women difficulty experience the violence, they feel strain and fear, hatred and humiliation.
Some women aren’t independent and confident, because they married with that man who harmed woman before wedding. Women complain to friends, neighbours, relatives about violence from husband, but only some women inform for police. The facts aren’t solved, because the women forgive for their violenctions, live with them and suffer.
The sociological investigations are the best ilustration of fact, that the women are depended on economy conditions in the family. This depending is connected with physical violence. In this article are explained prevention possibilities (the Women crisis centres, psichology services, ungovernment organizations). Its are explained some standpoints about punishments for thees, who beats and harms women. There are some ideas from Criminal Code of Lithuanian Republic and UNIFEM organization about the violence for women. The author of this article thinks, that the society has to know about problems in the families.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Irena Šutinienė,
Between the Critique of Socialism and Childhood Nostalgia: The Memory of Soviet Era in the Life Stories of the 1970s Generation
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2020): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Dovilė Tatarėlienė,
Social Mobility in Post-socialist Countries: State of the Art and Topical Research Issues
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 38 No. 1 (2016): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Irina Kučinskė,
Peculiarities of Elite’ Image Formation In Lithuanian Mass-Media
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 16 (2005): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Gediminas Navaitis,
Vladas Gaidys,
LITHUANIANS’ ATTITUDES TOWARDS FAMILY RIGHTS OF THE SAME GENDER COUPLES
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 37 No. 2 (2015): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Lina Birškytė,
NOSTALGIA AS AN OBJECT OF SOCIOLOGICAL STUDY: ISSUES AND THEORETICAL APPROACHES
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 36 No. 1 (2015): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Jolanta Piliponytė,
Possibility of Resocialization in the Penitentiary System of Lithuania
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: No. 1-2 (2000): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Zenonas Norkus,
Robert Merton and Contemporary Sociology
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 1 No. 1 (1997): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Gražina Rapolienė,
Algirdas Juozulynas,
Ageing body in the public discourse
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 24 (2009): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Tadas Leončikas,
Preconditions of Assimilation and the Choice of School: Comparison Between Groups of Parents of the First-Graders
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 17 (2006): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Rūta Žiliukaitė,
Intergenerational Value Shift from Traditional to Secular-Rational Values in Lithuania
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 19 (2007): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas