Abstract
In this article are analysed reasons of violence for women in the family: the influence of patriarchalism model, poverty, the view for woman in the contect of history, depresion, discord and conflicts between members of family. On the ground of G. D. Myers, J. Gilligan, P. L. Berger, A. M. Pavilionienė, K. Miškinis and other authors ideas, there are explained origin of violence for women, the whole of values, traditions, customs, habits and attitudes what have influence for inequality of sex. In the modern society the role of woman is very depreciated, because the women are sold to slavery, they are beat, killed.
The results of investigation proved, that women conflict and cross with their husbands, because they drink hard, humiliate wives, don’t agree for education of children, for poverty in their family. Husbands attach a little attention for their wives. They don’t like, that wives don’t take care for them. Women difficulty experience the violence, they feel strain and fear, hatred and humiliation.
Some women aren’t independent and confident, because they married with that man who harmed woman before wedding. Women complain to friends, neighbours, relatives about violence from husband, but only some women inform for police. The facts aren’t solved, because the women forgive for their violenctions, live with them and suffer.
The sociological investigations are the best ilustration of fact, that the women are depended on economy conditions in the family. This depending is connected with physical violence. In this article are explained prevention possibilities (the Women crisis centres, psichology services, ungovernment organizations). Its are explained some standpoints about punishments for thees, who beats and harms women. There are some ideas from Criminal Code of Lithuanian Republic and UNIFEM organization about the violence for women. The author of this article thinks, that the society has to know about problems in the families.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Laura Varnauskaitė,
Comparative Analysis of Moral Action in Sociological Theories of Vytautas Kavolis and Émile Durkheim
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 33 No. 2 (2013): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Jūratė Imbrasaitė,
Political Participation and Social Environment
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 10 (2002): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Valery Yevarouski,
Hijacking Sorrow, Joy, Pleasure and Reward: A Philosophical Interpretive Framework for the Theory of Alcohol Addiction
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 41 No. 2 (2017): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Lilija Kublickienė,
The Characteristics of Masculine Roles in Present-Day Lithuania
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 12 (2003): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Aleksandras Dobryninas,
Criminology and Authority
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 20 (2007): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Rūta Žiliukaitė,
Intergenerational Value Differences in Contemporary Lithuanian Society
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 39 No. 2 (2016): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Tomas Kiauka,
The Time-Space and Identity Discourse of a City – or How to Appropriate Klaipėda?
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2018): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Andrew Jamison,
Leonardas Rinkevičius,
The role of social movements in shaping the climate change knowledge and public discourse
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 27 (2010): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Algimantas Valantiejus,
Historical Comparative Sociology of Zenonas Norkus: an Analysis of Unachieved Possibilities of Early Lithuanian Empire
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 27 (2010): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas
-
Jolanta Bielskienė,
The “Professional” Political Participation and Its Influence on the Deficit of Democracy
,
Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas: Vol. 38 No. 1 (2016): Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas