Abstract
This article aims to reveal the role of political power in the construction of collective identity through the collective memory. Three aspects is seeking to “hook” in the theoretical level: the determined trends of globalised current time, the national state as a homogeneous “imagined” community and cultural heritage as a historical reality and factor of joining together communities. The analysis uncovers that globalization is a dualistic phenomena. The tendencies could be marked under living conditions today: the ontological anxiety of society, a collective identity crisis, the legal and actual threats to the sovereignty, which may retain the nation state. Nationalism, as the ideological force homogenizing state and society, is strongly actualizing and becomes a “headache” not only for communities but also for the political authorities, who can’t stay away from declaring liberal laissez-faire principle, but must choose one from David Brown’s proposed nationalism strategies of society’s consolidation: ethno-cultural, civic or multicultural. Cultural heritage expressing a symbolic link to the legacy of previous generations must now become not only culturally, but also political and economic resource to the communities and politicians to create the basis for the stability of society and the state. The role of cultural heritage in the international political economy, development of public image models and developing positive relationships with neighbors in the historical context is very relevant today. Reinterpretation of cultural heritage dissonances in academic and public discourses should help to reconstruct the historical oblivion and construct the new formulas of collective identity in the second millennium of Lithuania.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Alvydas Jokubaitis,
POLITICS AND MYSTICISM
,
Politologija: Vol. 58 No. 2 (2010): Politologija
-
Ieva Skurdauskaitė,
Quantum Mind Theory in International Relations: Between Illusion and Science
,
Politologija: Vol. 91 No. 3 (2018): Politologija
-
Justinas Lingevičius,
HOW SHOULD WE DISCUSS SMALL STATES? ANALYSING THE DEFINITIONS OF SMALLNESS
,
Politologija: Vol. 82 No. 2 (2016): Politologija
-
Eglė Čeponytė,
DO CHANGES IN THE EUROPEAN UNION BUDGET MEET FISCAL FEDERALISM PRINCIPLES: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE 2007–2014 EU BUDGETS
,
Politologija: Vol. 77 No. 1 (2015): Politologija
-
Benas Brunalas,
THE IMPERISATION OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE SMALL STATES
,
Politologija: Vol. 64 No. 4 (2011): Politologija
-
Justinas Dementavičius,
THREE HISTORICAL WAYS O FMAKING SENSE OF POLITICAL: NON-POWER VIEW ON RELATION BETWEEN HISTORY AND POLITICS
,
Politologija: Vol. 57 No. 1 (2010): Politologija
-
Justinas Dementavičius,
The Lithuanian State as an Ideological Project
,
Politologija: Vol. 89 No. 1 (2018): Politologija
-
Arnas Zdanovičius,
KODĖL KULTŪROS POLITIKOS NEIŠGELBĖJO LAISVOJI RINKA?
,
Politologija: Vol. 87 No. 3 (2017): Politologija
-
Gintas Karalius,
Does Modern Democracy Represent the People?
,
Politologija: Vol. 91 No. 3 (2018): Politologija
-
Alvydas Jokubaitis,
Linas Jokubaitis,
The Conflict between Romanticism and the Idea of the Statesman
,
Politologija: Vol. 89 No. 1 (2018): Politologija