Patent foramen ovale in young stroke patients: diagnostic challenge and a new approach to the secondary prevention (a case report and review of literature)
Case Reports
I. Beržanskytė
Vilnius University, Lithuania
J. Valaikienė
Vilnius University, Lithuania
D. Jatužis
Vilnius University, Lithuania
Published 2018-06-25
https://doi.org/10.29014/ns.2018.17
PDF

Keywords

patent foramen ovale
cryptogenic stroke
embolic stroke of undetermined source
paradoxical embolization

How to Cite

1.
Beržanskytė I, Valaikienė J, Jatužis D. Patent foramen ovale in young stroke patients: diagnostic challenge and a new approach to the secondary prevention (a case report and review of literature). NS [Internet]. 2018 Jun. 25 [cited 2024 Nov. 21];22(2(76):131-6. Available from: https://www.journals.vu.lt/neurologijos_seminarai/article/view/27843

Abstract

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) occurs in about 25% of healthy adults, however, it is significantly more common among patients with cryptogenic stroke. Although PFO might be a direct cause of ischemia, it is often an accidental finding in stroke patients. In most cases, cryptogenic stroke with PFO is just a presumed diagnosis as it is difficult to prove PFO as etiological factor. Randomized trials and meta-analysis have showed controversial results in searching for the most effective prevention of cryptogenic stroke with PFO recurrence in the last six years. Nevertheless, currently available data suggests that PFO closure is superior to medical therapy. Two problems remain in clinical settings: identification of patients who would benefit from PFO closure most and the exact indications for intervention. In this article we present a clinical case and review literature examining diagnostic and secondary prevention of cryptogenic stroke with PFO.

PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.