Abstract
The paper deals with the sociology of literature of Pierre Bourdieu, one of the most influential figures in contemporary sociology of art. Initially, Bourdieu intended to overcome dichotomy of formalistic and contextual approaches, to transcend both the subjectivism and objectivism and to situate culture within broader social context and power relations. The sociologist suggested a systematic approach to literary practise and elaborated a theory of fields, the key terms of which are field, habitus, economic, social, cultural and symbolic capital, struggles, stake, structural homology, positions, dispositions, domination, strategy etc. The specificity of the literary field is defined mostly by the concepts of relative autonomy and “reversed” economy. Bourdieu examines the social positions of individuals and institutions involved in making cultural products (writers, publishers, critics, readers etc.), the social conditions, circulation and consumption of literary works. In this conceptual framework, literary text gains a specific status as the independent object of analysis (even such literary features as genre, narrative devices, types of characters etc. have special social meaning and function), what distinguishes Bourdieu from many his predecessors. His practical researches bring together various methods and combine empirical analysis with a strong theoretical frame. Numerous contemporary projects of sociology of culture are based on Bourdieu’s ideas. Some issues, however, have been brought for discussion, especially the universality of the notions and the concept of autonomy. Bourdieu constructed a powerful, highly theoretically structured model for interpretation of literature. It integrates every element of culture and provides tools for revealing their complex dialectical relations. Bourdieu’s sociology of literature might be a beneficial mode of analysis for Lithuanian literary scholars.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Neringa Klišienė,
The Short Dramatic Form in the Works of Kostas Ostrauskas and Juozas Erlickas
,
Literatūra: Vol. 65 No. 1 (2023): Literatūra
-
Literatūra 2015 56-57 (2),
Памятка авторам
,
Literatūra: Vol. 57 No. 2 (2015): Russian Literature
-
Rūta Šlapkauskaitė,
Editorial Board and Table of Contents
,
Literatūra: Vol. 62 No. 2 (2020): Rusistica Vilnensis
-
Literatūra 2013 Nr. 3, T. 55,
Kronika
,
Literatūra: Vol. 55 No. 3 (2013): the Classics
-
Vitaly Asovsky,
My Moscow Time
,
Literatūra: Vol. 63 No. 2 (2021): Rusistica Vilnensis
-
Viktorija Daujotytė,
Not Like the Others: In Honor of Professor Vitas Areška (1927 01 06–2019 11 05)
,
Literatūra: Vol. 61 No. 1 (2019): Literature
-
Journal Literatūra,
2005 METAI KLASIKINĖS FILOLOGIJOS KATEDROJE
,
Literatūra: Vol. 47 No. 3 (2005): the Classics
-
Галина Михайлова,
Поэтика прозы Людмилы Улицкой
,
Literatūra: Vol. 64 No. 2 (2022): Literatūra
-
Regimantas Tamošaitis,
Lietuvių literatūros kanono horizontai ir peripetijos
,
Literatūra: Vol. 65 No. 1 (2023): Literatūra
-
Literatūra,
2007 metai Klasikinės filologijos katedroje
,
Literatūra: Vol. 49 No. 3 (2007): the Classics