Abstract
The paper deals with the sociology of literature of Pierre Bourdieu, one of the most influential figures in contemporary sociology of art. Initially, Bourdieu intended to overcome dichotomy of formalistic and contextual approaches, to transcend both the subjectivism and objectivism and to situate culture within broader social context and power relations. The sociologist suggested a systematic approach to literary practise and elaborated a theory of fields, the key terms of which are field, habitus, economic, social, cultural and symbolic capital, struggles, stake, structural homology, positions, dispositions, domination, strategy etc. The specificity of the literary field is defined mostly by the concepts of relative autonomy and “reversed” economy. Bourdieu examines the social positions of individuals and institutions involved in making cultural products (writers, publishers, critics, readers etc.), the social conditions, circulation and consumption of literary works. In this conceptual framework, literary text gains a specific status as the independent object of analysis (even such literary features as genre, narrative devices, types of characters etc. have special social meaning and function), what distinguishes Bourdieu from many his predecessors. His practical researches bring together various methods and combine empirical analysis with a strong theoretical frame. Numerous contemporary projects of sociology of culture are based on Bourdieu’s ideas. Some issues, however, have been brought for discussion, especially the universality of the notions and the concept of autonomy. Bourdieu constructed a powerful, highly theoretically structured model for interpretation of literature. It integrates every element of culture and provides tools for revealing their complex dialectical relations. Bourdieu’s sociology of literature might be a beneficial mode of analysis for Lithuanian literary scholars.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Ольга Кириченко,
“Смехом смерть поправ…”
,
Literatūra: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2005): Russian Literature
-
Valentina Brio,
From the Letters of Birutė Masionienė (1991–1996)
,
Literatūra: Vol. 62 No. 2 (2020): Rusistica Vilnensis
-
Jurgita Raškevičiūtė,
Dvigubo žvilgsnio knyga, arba apie kalbėjimą kūnu
,
Literatūra: Vol. 50 No. 1 (2008): Lithuanian Literature
-
Наталия Арлаускайте,
Диегетические игры Куросавы с Идиотом
,
Literatūra: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2005): Russian Literature
-
Pavel Lavrinec,
Alexander Blok in the Russian Environment of Interwar Wilno
,
Literatūra: Vol. 63 No. 2 (2021): Rusistica Vilnensis
-
Gražina Kelmelytė,
The Concept of Bridal Chamber in the Valentinian Inscriptions
,
Literatūra: Vol. 62 No. 3 (2020): Studies of Ancient Culture and Its Reception
-
Dalia Kolytaitė,
Teatras popieriaus lape: Egono Schiele’s ekspresionistiniai autoportretai
,
Literatūra: Vol. 46 No. 4 (2004): World Literatures
-
Journal Literatūra,
OPUS. Цикл международных научных конфере
,
Literatūra: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2005): Russian Literature
-
Tomas Riklius,
(Not an) ambivalence toward Michelangelo in Federico Borromeo’s De pictura sacra and Musaeum
,
Literatūra: Vol. 62 No. 3 (2020): Studies of Ancient Culture and Its Reception
-
Павел Ивинский,
Толстоведение профессора Базылия Бялокоз
,
Literatūra: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2005): Russian Literature