Abstract
The paper deals with the sociology of literature of Pierre Bourdieu, one of the most influential figures in contemporary sociology of art. Initially, Bourdieu intended to overcome dichotomy of formalistic and contextual approaches, to transcend both the subjectivism and objectivism and to situate culture within broader social context and power relations. The sociologist suggested a systematic approach to literary practise and elaborated a theory of fields, the key terms of which are field, habitus, economic, social, cultural and symbolic capital, struggles, stake, structural homology, positions, dispositions, domination, strategy etc. The specificity of the literary field is defined mostly by the concepts of relative autonomy and “reversed” economy. Bourdieu examines the social positions of individuals and institutions involved in making cultural products (writers, publishers, critics, readers etc.), the social conditions, circulation and consumption of literary works. In this conceptual framework, literary text gains a specific status as the independent object of analysis (even such literary features as genre, narrative devices, types of characters etc. have special social meaning and function), what distinguishes Bourdieu from many his predecessors. His practical researches bring together various methods and combine empirical analysis with a strong theoretical frame. Numerous contemporary projects of sociology of culture are based on Bourdieu’s ideas. Some issues, however, have been brought for discussion, especially the universality of the notions and the concept of autonomy. Bourdieu constructed a powerful, highly theoretically structured model for interpretation of literature. It integrates every element of culture and provides tools for revealing their complex dialectical relations. Bourdieu’s sociology of literature might be a beneficial mode of analysis for Lithuanian literary scholars.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles in this journal
-
Liubov Kikhney,
Mandelstam and Heraclitus
,
Literatūra: Vol. 62 No. 2 (2020): Rusistica Vilnensis
-
Dovilė Keršienė,
Some Medieval Epistolic Language Features in the Latin Letters of Vytautas the Great
,
Literatūra: Vol. 58 No. 3 (2016): the Classics
-
Aliona Sofija Sofija Ivinskaja,
The Reception of Anna Akhmatova’s Creativity in the Literature of the Lithuanian Exodus (Henrikas Radauskas, Alfonsas Nyka-Niliūnas, Tomas Venclova)
,
Literatūra: Vol. 60 No. 2 (2018): Russian Literature
-
Таисия Орал,
Затерянный мир русской поэзии Литвы (по поводу сборника стихотворений Виталия Асовского «Стихи о человеке»)
,
Literatūra: Vol. 58 No. 2 (2016): Russian Literature
-
Валентина Брио,
«Осень выдалась теплой, я жил в литве…»
,
Literatūra: Vol. 52 No. 2 (2010): Russian Literature
-
Milda Danytė,
Graphic Novels: a new literary genre in the English-speaking world
,
Literatūra: Vol. 51 No. 4 (2009): World Literatures
-
Vaidas Šeferis,
National identity in the Lithuanian biography (Jonas Basanavičius, Jonas Šliūpas, Vincas Kudirka)
,
Literatūra: Vol. 48 No. 5 (2006): Special Issue
-
Irina Beliajeva,
Laughter in the Dark by Vladimir Nabokov: on the Symbiosis of Literature and Opera
,
Literatūra: Vol. 46 No. 4 (2004): World Literatures
-
Jadvyga Bajarūnienė,
Franzo Kafkos kūrybos recepcija Lietuvoje (1939–1989)
,
Literatūra: Vol. 53 No. 4 (2011): World Literatures
-
Monika Voinič,
Plutarch’s attitude towards educated woman (treatises Coniugalia praecepta and Consolatio aduxorem)
,
Literatūra: Vol. 52 No. 3 (2010): the Classics