Abstract
In the Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian we find a presentation of a theory of the virtues of eloquence: purity of language (latinitas), clarity (perspicuitas), appropriateness (aptum) and ornament (ornatus). All of them were originated by earlier Greek philosophers Aristotle and Theophrastus. Later this theory was taken on and elaborated by Roman rhetoricians – Cicero and Quintilian. Aristotle in his Rhetoric explicitly identified three of the four virtues (clarity, appropriateness and correctness). Theophrastus created a theory of four virtues of eloquence (correctness, clarity, appropriateness and ornament). His system was adopted by most of others. Dionysius, however, developed the most complex system of virtues. He presented a theory of virtues, which were divided into necessary (purity of language, appropriateness, lucidity and brevity) and accessory ones. The accessory virtues were further subdivided into another three groups. Rhetorica ad Herennium offered a three fold system: elegantia (including both correctness and clarity), compositio (similar to appropriateness) and diginitas (similar to ornament). Basically, in almost all aspects being closer to Cicero (who continues the tradition of Theophrastus), Quintilian is more focused on his theory of eloquence. He discusses the virtues of eloquence very widely and deeply, step by step, drawing a number of examples and including the educational process of an orator. Above all, although the theory of four virtues of Quintilian has been influenced by Ciceron, to some extent in general it does not claim originality and plays a paramount role in modern rhetorics, stylistic and pedagogy.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Сергей Дауговиш,
Мужское / женское в «Скверном анекдоте»
,
Literatūra: Vol. 51 No. 2 (2009): Russian Literature
-
Ирина Куликова,
Тип француза-гувернера XVIII века в русской литературе
,
Literatūra: Vol. 48 No. 2 (2006): Russian Literature
-
Ernstas Ribbatas,
VON RUHIG BIS GOETHE UND ÜBER IHN HINAUS: VOLKSPOESIE UND KUNSTLITERATUR
,
Literatūra: Vol. 50 No. 5 (2008): Special Issue
-
Павел Лавринец,
Мотив неуспеха в поздней публицистике Д. В. Философова
,
Literatūra: Vol. 48 No. 2 (2006): Russian Literature
-
Татьяна Автухович,
Жизнь в виртуале, или Конфигурация внутреннего пространства в условиях белорусской гетеротопии
,
Literatūra: Vol. 57 No. 5 (2015): Special Issue
-
Vytautas Bikulčius,
Mitobiografijos bruožai Claude’o Louis-Combet romane Durk, erškėti juodasai
,
Literatūra: Vol. 50 No. 4 (2008): World Literatures
-
Марина Ивинская,
Балис Сруога (1896–1947)
,
Literatūra: Vol. 49 No. 2 (2007): Russian Literature
-
Александр Лифшиц,
«Тунисской паша» Михаила Матинского.
,
Literatūra: Vol. 57 No. 2 (2015): Russian Literature
-
Дагне Бержайте,
О главном герое романов Достоевского (Заметки на полях книги Л. Сараскиной «Достоевский»)
,
Literatūra: Vol. 54 No. 2 (2012): Russian Literature
-
Ирина Куликова,
Тип подьячего в истории русской литературы ХVIII века (I)
,
Literatūra: Vol. 49 No. 2 (2007): Russian Literature