Abstract
In the Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian we find a presentation of a theory of the virtues of eloquence: purity of language (latinitas), clarity (perspicuitas), appropriateness (aptum) and ornament (ornatus). All of them were originated by earlier Greek philosophers Aristotle and Theophrastus. Later this theory was taken on and elaborated by Roman rhetoricians – Cicero and Quintilian. Aristotle in his Rhetoric explicitly identified three of the four virtues (clarity, appropriateness and correctness). Theophrastus created a theory of four virtues of eloquence (correctness, clarity, appropriateness and ornament). His system was adopted by most of others. Dionysius, however, developed the most complex system of virtues. He presented a theory of virtues, which were divided into necessary (purity of language, appropriateness, lucidity and brevity) and accessory ones. The accessory virtues were further subdivided into another three groups. Rhetorica ad Herennium offered a three fold system: elegantia (including both correctness and clarity), compositio (similar to appropriateness) and diginitas (similar to ornament). Basically, in almost all aspects being closer to Cicero (who continues the tradition of Theophrastus), Quintilian is more focused on his theory of eloquence. He discusses the virtues of eloquence very widely and deeply, step by step, drawing a number of examples and including the educational process of an orator. Above all, although the theory of four virtues of Quintilian has been influenced by Ciceron, to some extent in general it does not claim originality and plays a paramount role in modern rhetorics, stylistic and pedagogy.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Наталья Туганова,
«Из сказки – в сказку»: конструирование отношений Марины Цветаевой и Сергея Эфрона в автобиографических текстах М. Цветаевой
,
Literatūra: Vol. 54 No. 2 (2012): Russian Literature
-
Regina Rudaitytė,
Charleso Dickenso kūrybos recepcija Lietuvoje: sceninės adaptacijos ir kritikų vertinimas (II dalis)
,
Literatūra: Vol. 53 No. 4 (2011): World Literatures
-
Regina Rudaitytė,
The ethical component in contemporary British writing
,
Literatūra: Vol. 50 No. 4 (2008): World Literatures
-
Jens Kirk,
Literary Culture in the Age of the Internet
,
Literatūra: Vol. 49 No. 5 (2007): Special Issue
-
Džiuljeta Maskuliūnienė,
Šiaulių universiteto Literatūros istorijos ir teorijos katedra 2011 metais
,
Literatūra: Vol. 54 No. 1 (2012): Lithuanian Literature
-
Сергей Преображенский,
Гетеротопия одного стихотворения («Пляска» Н. Асеева как балто-славянский текст)
,
Literatūra: Vol. 57 No. 5 (2015): Special Issue
-
Tomas Veteikis,
Nuorodos į Isokratą Aristotelio Retorikos mene
,
Literatūra: Vol. 53 No. 3 (2011): the Classics
-
Horatio Caesar Roger Vella,
The Islands of Malta and Gozo in Greek and Roman History and Literature
,
Literatūra: Vol. 63 No. 3 (2021): Literature
-
Dalia Satkauskytė,
Teorijos išbandymas praktika [Danas Lapkus, Poteksčių ribos: uždraustos tapatybės devintojo dešimtmečio lietuvių prozoje, 2003]
,
Literatūra: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2005): Lithuanian Literature
-
Ирина Горошко,
Русская литература как школьный предмет: конструирование гендера в литературном дискурсе
,
Literatūra: Vol. 53 No. 2 (2011): Russian Literature