Abstract
In the Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian we find a presentation of a theory of the virtues of eloquence: purity of language (latinitas), clarity (perspicuitas), appropriateness (aptum) and ornament (ornatus). All of them were originated by earlier Greek philosophers Aristotle and Theophrastus. Later this theory was taken on and elaborated by Roman rhetoricians – Cicero and Quintilian. Aristotle in his Rhetoric explicitly identified three of the four virtues (clarity, appropriateness and correctness). Theophrastus created a theory of four virtues of eloquence (correctness, clarity, appropriateness and ornament). His system was adopted by most of others. Dionysius, however, developed the most complex system of virtues. He presented a theory of virtues, which were divided into necessary (purity of language, appropriateness, lucidity and brevity) and accessory ones. The accessory virtues were further subdivided into another three groups. Rhetorica ad Herennium offered a three fold system: elegantia (including both correctness and clarity), compositio (similar to appropriateness) and diginitas (similar to ornament). Basically, in almost all aspects being closer to Cicero (who continues the tradition of Theophrastus), Quintilian is more focused on his theory of eloquence. He discusses the virtues of eloquence very widely and deeply, step by step, drawing a number of examples and including the educational process of an orator. Above all, although the theory of four virtues of Quintilian has been influenced by Ciceron, to some extent in general it does not claim originality and plays a paramount role in modern rhetorics, stylistic and pedagogy.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Genovaitė Dručkutė,
Lietuvos įvaizdis Oskaro Milašiaus publicistikoje
,
Literatūra: Vol. 49 No. 4 (2007): World Literatures
-
Галина Михайлова,
“When You Come to Live in Switzerland, You Need to find it in itself and for itself”: The Swiss Idyllic Locus in the Interpretation of Mikhail Shishkin
,
Literatūra: Vol. 57 No. 2 (2015): Russian Literature
-
LEU Lietuvių Lietuvių ir lyginamosios literatūros katedros informacija,
2011 metai Lietuvos edukologijos universiteto lietuvių ir lyginamosios literatūros katedroje
,
Literatūra: Vol. 54 No. 1 (2012): Lithuanian Literature
-
Eglė Kačkutė,
Identity that transcends itself in A.L. Kennedy’s So I’m Glad and Original Bliss
,
Literatūra: Vol. 51 No. 4 (2009): World Literatures
-
Rūta Eidukevičienė,
(RE)KONSTRUKTION DER VERGANGENHEIT IM NEUEN DEUTSCHEN FAMILIENROMAN (UNTER BESONDERER BERÜCKSICHTIGUNG DES ROMANS DIE MITTAGSFRAU VON JULIA FRANCK)
,
Literatūra: Vol. 50 No. 5 (2008): Special Issue
-
Rasa Klioštoraitytė,
Piero Paolo Pasolini poetika. Kūryba kaip veiksmas
,
Literatūra: Vol. 46 No. 4 (2004): World Literatures
-
Sigita Barniškienė,
Collision Between the Own and the Foreign in the Short Story „Die Ferne ist nah genug“ (“The Faraway Land is Close Enough“) by Siegfried Lenz
,
Literatūra: Vol. 57 No. 4 (2015): World Literatures
-
Audronė Kudulytė-Kairienė,
The Greek Dialects in Old Attic Comedy
,
Literatūra: Vol. 55 No. 3 (2013): the Classics
-
Dainius Razauskas,
The Girl-Tree: An Essay in Dendromythology
,
Literatūra: Vol. 59 No. 1 (2017): Literature
-
Jonas Dumčius,
Plautas. Belaisviai
,
Literatūra: Vol. 49 No. 3 (2007): the Classics