Abstract
In the Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian we find a presentation of a theory of the virtues of eloquence: purity of language (latinitas), clarity (perspicuitas), appropriateness (aptum) and ornament (ornatus). All of them were originated by earlier Greek philosophers Aristotle and Theophrastus. Later this theory was taken on and elaborated by Roman rhetoricians – Cicero and Quintilian. Aristotle in his Rhetoric explicitly identified three of the four virtues (clarity, appropriateness and correctness). Theophrastus created a theory of four virtues of eloquence (correctness, clarity, appropriateness and ornament). His system was adopted by most of others. Dionysius, however, developed the most complex system of virtues. He presented a theory of virtues, which were divided into necessary (purity of language, appropriateness, lucidity and brevity) and accessory ones. The accessory virtues were further subdivided into another three groups. Rhetorica ad Herennium offered a three fold system: elegantia (including both correctness and clarity), compositio (similar to appropriateness) and diginitas (similar to ornament). Basically, in almost all aspects being closer to Cicero (who continues the tradition of Theophrastus), Quintilian is more focused on his theory of eloquence. He discusses the virtues of eloquence very widely and deeply, step by step, drawing a number of examples and including the educational process of an orator. Above all, although the theory of four virtues of Quintilian has been influenced by Ciceron, to some extent in general it does not claim originality and plays a paramount role in modern rhetorics, stylistic and pedagogy.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Lina Tylaitė,
Idealus valdovas Pindaro pirmojoje olimpinėje odėje
,
Literatūra: Vol. 58 No. 3 (2016): the Classics
-
Liucija Černiuvienė,
Įvaizdžių perteikimas Oskaro Milašiaus eilėraščio „NEMIGA“ (« INSOMNIE ») vertimuose
,
Literatūra: Vol. 53 No. 4 (2011): World Literatures
-
Павел Лавринец,
Книга Сергея Исакова о культуре русской эмиграции в Эстонии
,
Literatūra: Vol. 54 No. 2 (2012): Russian Literature
-
Raminta Važgėlaitė,
Audimo, kaip tekstą organizuojančio elemento, vaidmuo Platono Valstybininke
,
Literatūra: Vol. 53 No. 3 (2011): the Classics
-
Таисия Лаукконен,
Гетеротопии национального поля литературы: теоретические проблемы исследования «других литератур» Литвы
,
Literatūra: Vol. 57 No. 5 (2015): Special Issue
-
Birutė Meržvinskaitė,
Interpretation of History in the Contemporary Lithuanian Essayistics
,
Literatūra: Vol. 63 No. 2 (2021): Rusistica Vilnensis
-
Павел Лавринец,
Монография о былине
,
Literatūra: Vol. 52 No. 2 (2010): Russian Literature
-
Regina Rudaitytė,
Refraction of the Canon in Antonia Susan Byatt’s Novel Possession
,
Literatūra: Vol. 47 No. 4 (2005): World Literatures
-
Genovaitė Dručkutė,
Lietuvos įvaizdis Oskaro Milašiaus publicistikoje
,
Literatūra: Vol. 49 No. 4 (2007): World Literatures
-
Horatio Caesar Roger Caesar Roger Vella,
The hospital of The Holy Spirit at Rabat, Malta, and its Latin inscriptions: a review
,
Literatūra: Vol. 49 No. 3 (2007): the Classics