Abstract
In the Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian we find a presentation of a theory of the virtues of eloquence: purity of language (latinitas), clarity (perspicuitas), appropriateness (aptum) and ornament (ornatus). All of them were originated by earlier Greek philosophers Aristotle and Theophrastus. Later this theory was taken on and elaborated by Roman rhetoricians – Cicero and Quintilian. Aristotle in his Rhetoric explicitly identified three of the four virtues (clarity, appropriateness and correctness). Theophrastus created a theory of four virtues of eloquence (correctness, clarity, appropriateness and ornament). His system was adopted by most of others. Dionysius, however, developed the most complex system of virtues. He presented a theory of virtues, which were divided into necessary (purity of language, appropriateness, lucidity and brevity) and accessory ones. The accessory virtues were further subdivided into another three groups. Rhetorica ad Herennium offered a three fold system: elegantia (including both correctness and clarity), compositio (similar to appropriateness) and diginitas (similar to ornament). Basically, in almost all aspects being closer to Cicero (who continues the tradition of Theophrastus), Quintilian is more focused on his theory of eloquence. He discusses the virtues of eloquence very widely and deeply, step by step, drawing a number of examples and including the educational process of an orator. Above all, although the theory of four virtues of Quintilian has been influenced by Ciceron, to some extent in general it does not claim originality and plays a paramount role in modern rhetorics, stylistic and pedagogy.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Windy Counsell Counsell Petrie,
For Illumination and Escape: Writing and Regeneration in 21st Century Jewish-American Literature
,
Literatūra: Vol. 49 No. 5 (2007): Special Issue
-
Rūta Eidukevičienė,
Mitas, gamta ir moteriškoji savimonė Brigitte’os Kronauer romane Moteris tarp pagalvių
,
Literatūra: Vol. 46 No. 5 (2004): Special Issue
-
Eugenija Ulèinaitë,
lasikinės filologijos katedros tarptautiniai moksliniai ryšiai (1944–2004)
,
Literatūra: Vol. 46 No. 3 (2004): the Classics
-
Елена Курант,
Рассказчик в пьесах Ивана Вырыпаева «Июль» и «Иллюзии»
,
Literatūra: Vol. 54 No. 2 (2012): Russian Literature
-
Birutė Meržvinskaitė,
Этика истории литературы
,
Literatūra: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2005): Russian Literature
-
Rasa Klioštoraitytė,
Dialogų tipai Piero Paolo Pasolinio romane “Teorema”
,
Literatūra: Vol. 48 No. 4 (2006): World Literatures
-
Neringa Klišienė,
Religinės patirties matmuo Antano Vaičiulaičio ir Paulio Claudelio (Paul Claudel) kūryboje
,
Literatūra: Vol. 49 No. 1 (2007): Lithuanian Literature
-
Viktorija Daujotytė,
Mentaliniai prasmės atributai
,
Literatūra: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2006): Lithuanian Literature
-
Donata Mitaitė,
The Contexts of Osip Mandelstam’s Works in Tomas Venclova’s Diptych “Two Poems about Love”
,
Literatūra: Vol. 62 No. 2 (2020): Rusistica Vilnensis
-
Jovita Dikmonienė,
Ar galime priskirti pretekstą Oktaviją Senekai?
,
Literatūra: Vol. 53 No. 3 (2011): the Classics