Abstract
In the Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian we find a presentation of a theory of the virtues of eloquence: purity of language (latinitas), clarity (perspicuitas), appropriateness (aptum) and ornament (ornatus). All of them were originated by earlier Greek philosophers Aristotle and Theophrastus. Later this theory was taken on and elaborated by Roman rhetoricians – Cicero and Quintilian. Aristotle in his Rhetoric explicitly identified three of the four virtues (clarity, appropriateness and correctness). Theophrastus created a theory of four virtues of eloquence (correctness, clarity, appropriateness and ornament). His system was adopted by most of others. Dionysius, however, developed the most complex system of virtues. He presented a theory of virtues, which were divided into necessary (purity of language, appropriateness, lucidity and brevity) and accessory ones. The accessory virtues were further subdivided into another three groups. Rhetorica ad Herennium offered a three fold system: elegantia (including both correctness and clarity), compositio (similar to appropriateness) and diginitas (similar to ornament). Basically, in almost all aspects being closer to Cicero (who continues the tradition of Theophrastus), Quintilian is more focused on his theory of eloquence. He discusses the virtues of eloquence very widely and deeply, step by step, drawing a number of examples and including the educational process of an orator. Above all, although the theory of four virtues of Quintilian has been influenced by Ciceron, to some extent in general it does not claim originality and plays a paramount role in modern rhetorics, stylistic and pedagogy.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Бируте Мержвинскайте,
Миф города в романах Ричардаса Гавялиса
,
Literatūra: Vol. 54 No. 2 (2012): Russian Literature
-
Žydronė Kolevinskienė,
2010 metai Vilniaus pedagoginio universiteto Lietuvių literatūros katedroje
,
Literatūra: Vol. 53 No. 1 (2011): Lithuanian Literature
-
Elžbieta M. M. Kowalska,
A woman in the culture, the culture of a woman: Caroline von Humboldt
,
Literatūra: Vol. 50 No. 5 (2008): Special Issue
-
Konstantinos Deligiorgis,
Herodotean Amestris, Sophoclean Deianeira and a Lethal Garment
,
Literatūra: Vol. 58 No. 3 (2016): the Classics
-
Галина Михайлова,
О метаисторическом свойстве русской культуры: история и современность
,
Literatūra: Vol. 57 No. 2 (2015): Russian Literature
-
Paulius Garbačiauskas,
The features of Hellenistic poetics in Aratus’ Phaenomena
,
Literatūra: Vol. 49 No. 3 (2007): the Classics
-
Dainora Pociūtė-Abukevičienė,
Ernesta Juknytė,
Vilniaus universiteto Lietuvių literatūros katedra 2011 metais
,
Literatūra: Vol. 53 No. 1 (2011): Lithuanian Literature
-
Birutė Meržvinskaitė,
Autorius ir skaitytojas Sigmundo Freudo psichoanalizėje
,
Literatūra: Vol. 52 No. 4 (2010): World Literatures
-
Ramunė Markevičiūtė,
Barbarians Speaking – The Historiographical Theater and Its Effect in Henry of Latvia’s Chronicon Livoniae
,
Literatūra: Vol. 58 No. 3 (2016): the Classics
-
Jurga Jonutytė,
Giedrė Šmitienė,
Kūniškoji tapatybės plotmė
,
Literatūra: Vol. 48 No. 6 (2006): Special Issue