Abstract
In the Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian we find a presentation of a theory of the virtues of eloquence: purity of language (latinitas), clarity (perspicuitas), appropriateness (aptum) and ornament (ornatus). All of them were originated by earlier Greek philosophers Aristotle and Theophrastus. Later this theory was taken on and elaborated by Roman rhetoricians – Cicero and Quintilian. Aristotle in his Rhetoric explicitly identified three of the four virtues (clarity, appropriateness and correctness). Theophrastus created a theory of four virtues of eloquence (correctness, clarity, appropriateness and ornament). His system was adopted by most of others. Dionysius, however, developed the most complex system of virtues. He presented a theory of virtues, which were divided into necessary (purity of language, appropriateness, lucidity and brevity) and accessory ones. The accessory virtues were further subdivided into another three groups. Rhetorica ad Herennium offered a three fold system: elegantia (including both correctness and clarity), compositio (similar to appropriateness) and diginitas (similar to ornament). Basically, in almost all aspects being closer to Cicero (who continues the tradition of Theophrastus), Quintilian is more focused on his theory of eloquence. He discusses the virtues of eloquence very widely and deeply, step by step, drawing a number of examples and including the educational process of an orator. Above all, although the theory of four virtues of Quintilian has been influenced by Ciceron, to some extent in general it does not claim originality and plays a paramount role in modern rhetorics, stylistic and pedagogy.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Юлия Снежко,
Гетеротопии Вильнюса в современном литовском романе: панорама как пространство неповседневности
,
Literatūra: Vol. 57 No. 5 (2015): Special Issue
-
Saulė Matulevičienė,
Vilnius region folklore as an inherent part of the national identity
,
Literatūra: Vol. 48 No. 5 (2006): Special Issue
-
Rasa Juozapaitytė,
Black Woman’s Self-Creation in Gayl Jones’s Novel Eva’s Man
,
Literatūra: Vol. 47 No. 4 (2005): World Literatures
-
Ernesta Juknytė,
Literatūra ir teologija: dialogo galimybės
,
Literatūra: Vol. 49 No. 1 (2007): Lithuanian Literature
-
Tatjana Aleknienė,
Istorijos teatras: Filosofijos ir Istorijos pokalbis Teofilakto Simokato Istorijos įžangoje
,
Literatūra: Vol. 46 No. 3 (2004): the Classics
-
Skirmantė Packočinaitė-Biržietienė,
Epigram Theatre by Martial
,
Literatūra: Vol. 46 No. 3 (2004): the Classics
-
Ona Daukšienė,
The 17th century Latin religious poetry in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania as a source of expression of Lithuanian religious identity
,
Literatūra: Vol. 48 No. 7 (2006): Special Issue
-
Krzysztof Tkaczyk,
„ICH FORDRE SO VIEL FREIHEIT UND MUSSE, ALS NÖTIG IST, ÜBER MICH SELBST, ÜBER MEINE BESTIMMUNG UND MEINEN WERTH ALS MENSCH ZU DENKEN“.1 ZUR KUNST- UND FREIHEITSKONZEPTION BEI KARL PHILIPP MORITZ
,
Literatūra: Vol. 50 No. 5 (2008): Special Issue
-
Rūta Eidukevičienė,
“Irgendwann holt einen die Vergangenheit ein…” Literarisches Erinnern im Roman Aus der Geschichte der Trennungen (1999) von Jürgen Becker
,
Literatūra: Vol. 49 No. 5 (2007): Special Issue
-
Genovaitė Dručkutė,
Decisions about the Beauty of Lithuania in Jean Mauclère’s 'Sous le ciel pâle de Lithuanie'
,
Literatūra: Vol. 62 No. 4 (2020): Literature