Abstract
In the Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian we find a presentation of a theory of the virtues of eloquence: purity of language (latinitas), clarity (perspicuitas), appropriateness (aptum) and ornament (ornatus). All of them were originated by earlier Greek philosophers Aristotle and Theophrastus. Later this theory was taken on and elaborated by Roman rhetoricians – Cicero and Quintilian. Aristotle in his Rhetoric explicitly identified three of the four virtues (clarity, appropriateness and correctness). Theophrastus created a theory of four virtues of eloquence (correctness, clarity, appropriateness and ornament). His system was adopted by most of others. Dionysius, however, developed the most complex system of virtues. He presented a theory of virtues, which were divided into necessary (purity of language, appropriateness, lucidity and brevity) and accessory ones. The accessory virtues were further subdivided into another three groups. Rhetorica ad Herennium offered a three fold system: elegantia (including both correctness and clarity), compositio (similar to appropriateness) and diginitas (similar to ornament). Basically, in almost all aspects being closer to Cicero (who continues the tradition of Theophrastus), Quintilian is more focused on his theory of eloquence. He discusses the virtues of eloquence very widely and deeply, step by step, drawing a number of examples and including the educational process of an orator. Above all, although the theory of four virtues of Quintilian has been influenced by Ciceron, to some extent in general it does not claim originality and plays a paramount role in modern rhetorics, stylistic and pedagogy.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Елена Тетерина,
Of Pastorality in Petras Cvirka’s Works
,
Literatūra: Vol. 57 No. 2 (2015): Russian Literature
-
Ингрида Киселюте,
VII научная международная конференция «Экономика. литература. язык» (Санкт-Петербург, 4-6 июня 2018 г.)
,
Literatūra: Vol. 60 No. 2 (2018): Russian Literature
-
Dainius Būrė,
Autorius, personažas, skaitytojas: retorinės įtaigos aspektas Ludovico Ariosto poemoje Pašėlęs Rolandas
,
Literatūra: Vol. 46 No. 4 (2004): World Literatures
-
Dalia Čiočytė,
Literatūros teologijos kaip teorinės perspektyvos galiojimo centras, periferija, ribos
,
Literatūra: Vol. 53 No. 1 (2011): Lithuanian Literature
-
Eugenija Ulčinaitė,
Marcelinas Ročka: klasikas ir lituanistas
,
Literatūra: Vol. 54 No. 3 (2012): the Classics
-
Radvyda Vaišvilaitė,
Specifics of theological questions in literature: sin in the texts of Aidas Marčėnas
,
Literatūra: Vol. 49 No. 1 (2007): Lithuanian Literature
-
Jūratė Butkutė,
Postmodern Transgressions of Narrative: an Intertextual Dialogue between J. Banville’s The Book of Evidence (1989) and V. Nabokov’s Lolita (1955)
,
Literatūra: Vol. 49 No. 5 (2007): Special Issue
-
Павел Лавринец,
Международная конференция «Псевдонимы русской эмиграции в Европе (1917–1945)» (Бохум, 3–5 сентября 2014 г.)
,
Literatūra: Vol. 57 No. 2 (2015): Russian Literature
-
Tua Korhonen,
Reflections on Domestication: “Tame” and “Wild” in the Aesopic Animal Fables
,
Literatūra: Vol. 59 No. 3 (2017): the Classics
-
Simonas Baliukonis,
The Athenian against Atheists: Theological Persuasion in Plato’s Laws
,
Literatūra: Vol. 62 No. 3 (2020): Studies of Ancient Culture and Its Reception