Abstract
In the Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian we find a presentation of a theory of the virtues of eloquence: purity of language (latinitas), clarity (perspicuitas), appropriateness (aptum) and ornament (ornatus). All of them were originated by earlier Greek philosophers Aristotle and Theophrastus. Later this theory was taken on and elaborated by Roman rhetoricians – Cicero and Quintilian. Aristotle in his Rhetoric explicitly identified three of the four virtues (clarity, appropriateness and correctness). Theophrastus created a theory of four virtues of eloquence (correctness, clarity, appropriateness and ornament). His system was adopted by most of others. Dionysius, however, developed the most complex system of virtues. He presented a theory of virtues, which were divided into necessary (purity of language, appropriateness, lucidity and brevity) and accessory ones. The accessory virtues were further subdivided into another three groups. Rhetorica ad Herennium offered a three fold system: elegantia (including both correctness and clarity), compositio (similar to appropriateness) and diginitas (similar to ornament). Basically, in almost all aspects being closer to Cicero (who continues the tradition of Theophrastus), Quintilian is more focused on his theory of eloquence. He discusses the virtues of eloquence very widely and deeply, step by step, drawing a number of examples and including the educational process of an orator. Above all, although the theory of four virtues of Quintilian has been influenced by Ciceron, to some extent in general it does not claim originality and plays a paramount role in modern rhetorics, stylistic and pedagogy.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Jovita Dikmonienė,
Performances of Antique Dramas in Lithuania
,
Literatūra: Vol. 46 No. 3 (2004): the Classics
-
Matas Grubliauskas,
Eugenija Ulčinaitė,
Eugenijus Frolovas
,
Literatūra: Vol. 54 No. 3 (2012): the Classics
-
Journal Literatūra,
Vilniaus universiteto Lietuvių literatūros katedra 2005 metais / Lituanistinių tyrimų projektas „Littera“ / Lietuvos lyginamosios literatūros asociacija / Lietuvių literatūros ir tautosakos instituto Šiuolaikinės literatūros skyrius 2005 metais / Šiaulių universiteto Literatūros istorijos ir teorijos katedra 2005 metais / Apie Vilniaus pedagoginio universiteto Lietuvių literatūros ir Visuotinės literatūros katedras 2005 metais / Klaipėdos universiteto literatūros katedra / Vytauto Didžiojo universiteto Lietuvių literatūros katedra. 2005-aisiais nudirbti darbai
,
Literatūra: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2006): Lithuanian Literature
-
Eugenija Ulčinaitė,
Tristia by Ovid: the History of Poet‘s Exile
,
Literatūra: Vol. 56 No. 3 (2014): the Classics
-
Aleksej Burov,
Modestas Kraužlys,
Frau Ava’s Antichrist: Its Composition and Translation into Lithuanian
,
Literatūra: Vol. 62 No. 4 (2020): Literature
-
Aleksej Burov,
Zukunftsorientierte Nostalgie? Evidenzen aus der eschatologischen Literatur des Mittelalters
,
Literatūra: Vol. 59 No. 4 (2017): World Literatures
-
Vanda Zaborskaitė,
ealistinė literatūra kaip Europos kultūros ženklas
,
Literatūra: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2006): Lithuanian Literature
-
Eglė Kačkutė,
Migrant Maternal Subjectivity in Betty Quan’s "Mother Tongue"
,
Literatūra: Vol. 57 No. 4 (2015): World Literatures
-
Viktorija Daujotytė-Pakerienė,
DUAL NATURE OF WORK OF A ART: FORMULA AND FORM
,
Literatūra: Vol. 55 No. 1 (2013): Lithuanian Literature
-
Regina Rudaitytė,
Editorial Board and Table of Contents
,
Literatūra: Vol. 61 No. 4 (2019): Literature