Abstract
In the Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian we find a presentation of a theory of the virtues of eloquence: purity of language (latinitas), clarity (perspicuitas), appropriateness (aptum) and ornament (ornatus). All of them were originated by earlier Greek philosophers Aristotle and Theophrastus. Later this theory was taken on and elaborated by Roman rhetoricians – Cicero and Quintilian. Aristotle in his Rhetoric explicitly identified three of the four virtues (clarity, appropriateness and correctness). Theophrastus created a theory of four virtues of eloquence (correctness, clarity, appropriateness and ornament). His system was adopted by most of others. Dionysius, however, developed the most complex system of virtues. He presented a theory of virtues, which were divided into necessary (purity of language, appropriateness, lucidity and brevity) and accessory ones. The accessory virtues were further subdivided into another three groups. Rhetorica ad Herennium offered a three fold system: elegantia (including both correctness and clarity), compositio (similar to appropriateness) and diginitas (similar to ornament). Basically, in almost all aspects being closer to Cicero (who continues the tradition of Theophrastus), Quintilian is more focused on his theory of eloquence. He discusses the virtues of eloquence very widely and deeply, step by step, drawing a number of examples and including the educational process of an orator. Above all, although the theory of four virtues of Quintilian has been influenced by Ciceron, to some extent in general it does not claim originality and plays a paramount role in modern rhetorics, stylistic and pedagogy.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Naglis Kardelis,
Ieškant tobulos malonumo ir protingumo mišinio formulės: apie lietuviškąjį Platono „filebo“ vertimą
,
Literatūra: Vol. 60 No. 3 (2018): the Classics
-
Elena Baliutytė,
Formen des Selbstbewusstseins in der litauischen Dokumentarliteratur
,
Literatūra: Vol. 50 No. 1 (2008): Lithuanian Literature
-
Регина Чичинскайте,
Разговор в отсутствии диалога: Александр Пятигорский
,
Literatūra: Vol. 52 No. 2 (2010): Russian Literature
-
Лаура Пикколо,
Вальпургиева Ночь, или гетеротопия советского сумасшедшего дома
,
Literatūra: Vol. 57 No. 5 (2015): Special Issue
-
Irena Štikonaitė,
In memoriam profesoriui Henrikui Zabuliui. H. Zabulio bibliografija
,
Literatūra: Vol. 52 No. 3 (2010): the Classics
-
Kęstutis Nastopka,
Dalia Kaladinskienė,
Miesto tekstas pagal Greimą ir Toporovą
,
Literatūra: Vol. 53 No. 4 (2011): World Literatures
-
Kristina Svarevičiūtė,
Traditions of Antiquity and New Tendencies in Written Greek of the Byzantine Period
,
Literatūra: Vol. 55 No. 3 (2013): the Classics
-
Birutė Meržvinskaitė,
Carlo Gustavo Jungo literatūros metafizika
,
Literatūra: Vol. 49 No. 2 (2007): Russian Literature
-
Eglė Kačkutė,
Identity in A.L. Kennedy’s Novel So I am Glad and Short Story Original Bliss
,
Literatūra: Vol. 49 No. 5 (2007): Special Issue
-
Vaidas Šeferis,
Iš naujo atrandamas Vilnius [Mindaugas Kvietkauskas, Vilniaus literatūrų kontrapunktai. Ankstyvasis modernizmas 1904–1915]
,
Literatūra: Vol. 49 No. 1 (2007): Lithuanian Literature