Abstract
In the Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian we find a presentation of a theory of the virtues of eloquence: purity of language (latinitas), clarity (perspicuitas), appropriateness (aptum) and ornament (ornatus). All of them were originated by earlier Greek philosophers Aristotle and Theophrastus. Later this theory was taken on and elaborated by Roman rhetoricians – Cicero and Quintilian. Aristotle in his Rhetoric explicitly identified three of the four virtues (clarity, appropriateness and correctness). Theophrastus created a theory of four virtues of eloquence (correctness, clarity, appropriateness and ornament). His system was adopted by most of others. Dionysius, however, developed the most complex system of virtues. He presented a theory of virtues, which were divided into necessary (purity of language, appropriateness, lucidity and brevity) and accessory ones. The accessory virtues were further subdivided into another three groups. Rhetorica ad Herennium offered a three fold system: elegantia (including both correctness and clarity), compositio (similar to appropriateness) and diginitas (similar to ornament). Basically, in almost all aspects being closer to Cicero (who continues the tradition of Theophrastus), Quintilian is more focused on his theory of eloquence. He discusses the virtues of eloquence very widely and deeply, step by step, drawing a number of examples and including the educational process of an orator. Above all, although the theory of four virtues of Quintilian has been influenced by Ciceron, to some extent in general it does not claim originality and plays a paramount role in modern rhetorics, stylistic and pedagogy.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Darius Kuolys,
Lietuvos Didžiosios Kunigaikštystės palikimas ir lietuviškoji tapatybė
,
Literatūra: Vol. 48 No. 7 (2006): Special Issue
-
Romualdas Skunčikas,
Viktorija Vaitkevičiūtė,
Vitalija Pilipauskaitė,
Geriausi 2005-ųjų studentai lituanistai – Klaipėdoje / Apie naujausius doktorantų humanitarinius tyrinėjimus / Jubiliejinė studentų lituanistų mokslinė konferencija Vilniaus universitete
,
Literatūra: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2006): Lithuanian Literature
-
Skirmantas Valentas,
Polilingvizmas kaip „grįžimas namõ“: tarp Babilono katastrofos ir Jeruzalės Sekminių stebuklo. Vlado Braziūno poezijos at(si)vėrimai
,
Literatūra: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2006): Lithuanian Literature
-
Tomas Veteikis,
Aspects of Self-presentation in the Speeches of Isocrates
,
Literatūra: Vol. 56 No. 3 (2014): the Classics
-
Veronika Gerliakienė,
Short Vilnius Churche’s Inscriptions: Some Problems of Classification and Terminology
,
Literatūra: Vol. 46 No. 3 (2004): the Classics
-
Jadvyga Bajarūnienė,
Der deutsche Expressionismus in der litauischen Literaturkritik der Zwischenkriegszeit
,
Literatūra: Vol. 50 No. 5 (2008): Special Issue
-
Laura Laurušaitė,
Postamentas postkolonializmui
,
Literatūra: Vol. 52 No. 1 (2010): Lithuanian Literature
-
Vytautas Bikulčius,
Les particularités du récit dans le roman L'AUTEUR ET MOI d'Éric Chevillard
,
Literatūra: Vol. 55 No. 4 (2013): World Literatures
-
Jūratė Levina,
Destruction of Textual and Discursive Frames in John Banville’s Novel Athena
,
Literatūra: Vol. 46 No. 4 (2004): World Literatures
-
Dagnė Beržaitė,
On the General Tendencies in Russian Classical Literature Translations to Lithuanian
,
Literatūra: Vol. 59 No. 2 (2017): Russian Literature