Abstract
In the Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian we find a presentation of a theory of the virtues of eloquence: purity of language (latinitas), clarity (perspicuitas), appropriateness (aptum) and ornament (ornatus). All of them were originated by earlier Greek philosophers Aristotle and Theophrastus. Later this theory was taken on and elaborated by Roman rhetoricians – Cicero and Quintilian. Aristotle in his Rhetoric explicitly identified three of the four virtues (clarity, appropriateness and correctness). Theophrastus created a theory of four virtues of eloquence (correctness, clarity, appropriateness and ornament). His system was adopted by most of others. Dionysius, however, developed the most complex system of virtues. He presented a theory of virtues, which were divided into necessary (purity of language, appropriateness, lucidity and brevity) and accessory ones. The accessory virtues were further subdivided into another three groups. Rhetorica ad Herennium offered a three fold system: elegantia (including both correctness and clarity), compositio (similar to appropriateness) and diginitas (similar to ornament). Basically, in almost all aspects being closer to Cicero (who continues the tradition of Theophrastus), Quintilian is more focused on his theory of eloquence. He discusses the virtues of eloquence very widely and deeply, step by step, drawing a number of examples and including the educational process of an orator. Above all, although the theory of four virtues of Quintilian has been influenced by Ciceron, to some extent in general it does not claim originality and plays a paramount role in modern rhetorics, stylistic and pedagogy.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Arnaldo di di Benedetto,
Un’introduzione al petrarchismo cinquecentesco
,
Literatūra: Vol. 48 No. 4 (2006): World Literatures
-
Dirk Weidmann,
“And I Tiresias have foresuffered all…” – More than allusions to Ovid in T.S. Eliot’s The Waste Land?
,
Literatūra: Vol. 51 No. 3 (2009): the Classics
-
Vigmantas Butkus,
Die Komödie “Der Gestiefelte Kater” von Ludwig Tieck: die Gestalten der romantischen Ironie
,
Literatūra: Vol. 49 No. 4 (2007): World Literatures
-
Inga Bartkuvienė,
Disbelief about the time. Timelessness in the late works of Paul Celan
,
Literatūra: Vol. 61 No. 4 (2019): Literature
-
Jovita Dikmonienė,
Anagnorisis in Aristotle’s Poetics: problems of definition and classification
,
Literatūra: Vol. 61 No. 3 (2019): Studies of Ancient Culture and Its Reception
-
Rita Tūtlytė,
The Poetry of Janina Degutytė. A Dialogue with Tradition: The Aspect of Imagery
,
Literatūra: Vol. 60 No. 1 (2018): Literatūre
-
Brigita Speičytė,
‘TILL SAMOGITIANS ARE ALIVE...’: THE TESTIMONY OF THE 1830–1831 REBELLION IN SAMOGITIA
,
Literatūra: Vol. 55 No. 1 (2013): Lithuanian Literature
-
Mantas Tamošaitis,
Augustine’s critique of representation in arts: Confessions
,
Literatūra: Vol. 61 No. 3 (2019): Studies of Ancient Culture and Its Reception
-
Liucija Černiuvienė,
Rūta Jakutytė,
Michel Houellebecq in Lithuanian: The Paradoxes of Translation
,
Literatūra: Vol. 61 No. 4 (2019): Literature
-
Audronė Kučinskienė,
Cicero’s attitude to Greeks and their culture
,
Literatūra: Vol. 48 No. 3 (2006): the Classics