Abstract
In the Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian we find a presentation of a theory of the virtues of eloquence: purity of language (latinitas), clarity (perspicuitas), appropriateness (aptum) and ornament (ornatus). All of them were originated by earlier Greek philosophers Aristotle and Theophrastus. Later this theory was taken on and elaborated by Roman rhetoricians – Cicero and Quintilian. Aristotle in his Rhetoric explicitly identified three of the four virtues (clarity, appropriateness and correctness). Theophrastus created a theory of four virtues of eloquence (correctness, clarity, appropriateness and ornament). His system was adopted by most of others. Dionysius, however, developed the most complex system of virtues. He presented a theory of virtues, which were divided into necessary (purity of language, appropriateness, lucidity and brevity) and accessory ones. The accessory virtues were further subdivided into another three groups. Rhetorica ad Herennium offered a three fold system: elegantia (including both correctness and clarity), compositio (similar to appropriateness) and diginitas (similar to ornament). Basically, in almost all aspects being closer to Cicero (who continues the tradition of Theophrastus), Quintilian is more focused on his theory of eloquence. He discusses the virtues of eloquence very widely and deeply, step by step, drawing a number of examples and including the educational process of an orator. Above all, although the theory of four virtues of Quintilian has been influenced by Ciceron, to some extent in general it does not claim originality and plays a paramount role in modern rhetorics, stylistic and pedagogy.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Vytautas Bikulčius,
A Lithuanian in Paris: Between Mania and Philia
,
Literatūra: Vol. 57 No. 4 (2015): World Literatures
-
Павел Лавринец,
A Mosaic of Archival Detective Novels from the Border
,
Literatūra: Vol. 60 No. 2 (2018): Russian Literature
-
Inga Bartkuvienė,
Das Spiel als der Wille der Schrift in der Erzälung Eliza Eliza von Ilse Aichinger
,
Literatūra: Vol. 49 No. 4 (2007): World Literatures
-
Audinga Peluritytė,
Metaphysical Experiences in Gražina Cieškaitė’s poetry
,
Literatūra: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2005): Lithuanian Literature
-
Natalia Ivanova,
On I. A. Bunin’s Story The Date and the Dedication to “M. P. Ch.”
,
Literatūra: Vol. 62 No. 2 (2020): Rusistica Vilnensis
-
Donata Mitaitė,
Istorija, poezija ir stereotipai
,
Literatūra: Vol. 53 No. 1 (2011): Lithuanian Literature
-
Vilius Bartninkas,
Civic Identity and Piety in Platoʼs Laws
,
Literatūra: Vol. 57 No. 3 (2015): the Classics
-
Александр Федута,
«Бывают странные сближения…» (Мелочи из запасов комментаторской памяти – 2)
,
Literatūra: Vol. 58 No. 2 (2016): Russian Literature
-
Vytautas Ališauskas,
Paradoxical Characters in Plato’s Symposium
,
Literatūra: Vol. 60 No. 3 (2018): the Classics
-
Джулия Джиганте,
Variations on the Theme of Light and Darkness in Elena Shvarts’s Poetry
,
Literatūra: Vol. 60 No. 2 (2018): Russian Literature