Abstract
In the Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian we find a presentation of a theory of the virtues of eloquence: purity of language (latinitas), clarity (perspicuitas), appropriateness (aptum) and ornament (ornatus). All of them were originated by earlier Greek philosophers Aristotle and Theophrastus. Later this theory was taken on and elaborated by Roman rhetoricians – Cicero and Quintilian. Aristotle in his Rhetoric explicitly identified three of the four virtues (clarity, appropriateness and correctness). Theophrastus created a theory of four virtues of eloquence (correctness, clarity, appropriateness and ornament). His system was adopted by most of others. Dionysius, however, developed the most complex system of virtues. He presented a theory of virtues, which were divided into necessary (purity of language, appropriateness, lucidity and brevity) and accessory ones. The accessory virtues were further subdivided into another three groups. Rhetorica ad Herennium offered a three fold system: elegantia (including both correctness and clarity), compositio (similar to appropriateness) and diginitas (similar to ornament). Basically, in almost all aspects being closer to Cicero (who continues the tradition of Theophrastus), Quintilian is more focused on his theory of eloquence. He discusses the virtues of eloquence very widely and deeply, step by step, drawing a number of examples and including the educational process of an orator. Above all, although the theory of four virtues of Quintilian has been influenced by Ciceron, to some extent in general it does not claim originality and plays a paramount role in modern rhetorics, stylistic and pedagogy.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Alius Jaskelevičius,
Daemonology in Apuleius’ De Deo Socratis
,
Literatūra: Vol. 57 No. 3 (2015): the Classics
-
Eugenija Ulčinaitė,
Scholastic Jesuit Theatre – a Part of Political Theatre in Great Duchy of Lithuania
,
Literatūra: Vol. 46 No. 3 (2004): the Classics
-
Aušra Martišiūtė,
Development of the awareness of national identity in mystery plays
,
Literatūra: Vol. 48 No. 5 (2006): Special Issue
-
Leonidas Donskis,
The sociogenesis of modern feelings: love and friendship in Miguel de Cervantes’ “Don Quixote” and William Shakespeare’s “Romeo and Juliet”
,
Literatūra: Vol. 48 No. 4 (2006): World Literatures
-
Инга Видугирите,
«Вильна» Константина Бальмонта: русский голос в вильнюсском тексте литовской литературы
,
Literatūra: Vol. 53 No. 2 (2011): Russian Literature
-
Jovita Dikmonienė,
Expression of the feelings of the characters and impact on the spectators in Seneca ’s dramas
,
Literatūra: Vol. 50 No. 3 (2008): the Classics
-
Александр Вавжиньчак,
Владимир Путин как литературный герой
,
Literatūra: Vol. 49 No. 2 (2007): Russian Literature
-
Genovaitė Dručkutė,
Un voyage d’oscar Milosz en Lituanie
,
Literatūra: Vol. 60 No. 4 (2018): Studies of Western Literature
-
Mgr. Aneta Petrová,
Czech, Slovak, and Lithuanian Conceptions of Essay – Two Genres
,
Literatūra: Vol. 57 No. 1 (2015): Lithuanian Literature
-
Audronė Kučinskienė,
Divinatio in Caecilium in the context of Cicero’s rhetoric
,
Literatūra: Vol. 52 No. 3 (2010): the Classics