Abstract
In the Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian we find a presentation of a theory of the virtues of eloquence: purity of language (latinitas), clarity (perspicuitas), appropriateness (aptum) and ornament (ornatus). All of them were originated by earlier Greek philosophers Aristotle and Theophrastus. Later this theory was taken on and elaborated by Roman rhetoricians – Cicero and Quintilian. Aristotle in his Rhetoric explicitly identified three of the four virtues (clarity, appropriateness and correctness). Theophrastus created a theory of four virtues of eloquence (correctness, clarity, appropriateness and ornament). His system was adopted by most of others. Dionysius, however, developed the most complex system of virtues. He presented a theory of virtues, which were divided into necessary (purity of language, appropriateness, lucidity and brevity) and accessory ones. The accessory virtues were further subdivided into another three groups. Rhetorica ad Herennium offered a three fold system: elegantia (including both correctness and clarity), compositio (similar to appropriateness) and diginitas (similar to ornament). Basically, in almost all aspects being closer to Cicero (who continues the tradition of Theophrastus), Quintilian is more focused on his theory of eloquence. He discusses the virtues of eloquence very widely and deeply, step by step, drawing a number of examples and including the educational process of an orator. Above all, although the theory of four virtues of Quintilian has been influenced by Ciceron, to some extent in general it does not claim originality and plays a paramount role in modern rhetorics, stylistic and pedagogy.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Eugenija Ulčinaitė,
Ovid’s Heroides: fluctuations among drama, lyrics and epos
,
Literatūra: Vol. 50 No. 3 (2008): the Classics
-
Наталья Ковтун,
Сонечки в новейшей русской прозе: к проблеме художественной трансформации мифологемы софийности
,
Literatūra: Vol. 53 No. 2 (2011): Russian Literature
-
Галина Михайлова,
Between a Granite Vase and Palace Doors. Once again about the Summer Garden by Anna Akhmatova
,
Literatūra: Vol. 60 No. 2 (2018): Russian Literature
-
Таисия Лаукконен,
Новая искренность советской поэтессы: «Последние стихи» Елены Ширман
,
Literatūra: Vol. 52 No. 2 (2010): Russian Literature
-
Ирина Куликова,
Тип служанки в русской комедии XVIII века
,
Literatūra: Vol. 52 No. 2 (2010): Russian Literature
-
Jadvyga Krūminienė,
John Donne’s Homilies: Paradox as an Instrument of Theopoetic Evocation
,
Literatūra: Vol. 46 No. 4 (2004): World Literatures
-
Inga Bartkuvienė,
Entwürfe der Subjektivität in der Lyrik Paul Celans (Sprachgitter)
,
Literatūra: Vol. 52 No. 4 (2010): World Literatures
-
France Grenaudier-Klijn,
L’objet-valise chez Patrick Modiano: une réticente nostalgie – «Villa triste », «Chien de printemps» et «Pour que tu ne te perdes pas dans le quartier»
,
Literatūra: Vol. 59 No. 4 (2017): World Literatures
-
iktorija Daujotytė-Pakerienė,
Esoterism in Literature and in Literary History
,
Literatūra: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2005): Lithuanian Literature
-
Rūta Šlapkauskaitė,
Problematising Multiculturalism in Canadian Literature
,
Literatūra: Vol. 47 No. 4 (2005): World Literatures