Abstract
In the Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian we find a presentation of a theory of the virtues of eloquence: purity of language (latinitas), clarity (perspicuitas), appropriateness (aptum) and ornament (ornatus). All of them were originated by earlier Greek philosophers Aristotle and Theophrastus. Later this theory was taken on and elaborated by Roman rhetoricians – Cicero and Quintilian. Aristotle in his Rhetoric explicitly identified three of the four virtues (clarity, appropriateness and correctness). Theophrastus created a theory of four virtues of eloquence (correctness, clarity, appropriateness and ornament). His system was adopted by most of others. Dionysius, however, developed the most complex system of virtues. He presented a theory of virtues, which were divided into necessary (purity of language, appropriateness, lucidity and brevity) and accessory ones. The accessory virtues were further subdivided into another three groups. Rhetorica ad Herennium offered a three fold system: elegantia (including both correctness and clarity), compositio (similar to appropriateness) and diginitas (similar to ornament). Basically, in almost all aspects being closer to Cicero (who continues the tradition of Theophrastus), Quintilian is more focused on his theory of eloquence. He discusses the virtues of eloquence very widely and deeply, step by step, drawing a number of examples and including the educational process of an orator. Above all, although the theory of four virtues of Quintilian has been influenced by Ciceron, to some extent in general it does not claim originality and plays a paramount role in modern rhetorics, stylistic and pedagogy.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Dainora Pociūtė,
“Empty titles” and real names: names of GDL protestants in old documents
,
Literatūra: Vol. 48 No. 7 (2006): Special Issue
-
Veronika Gerliakienė,
Applied emblems in Vilnius churches and their literary sources
,
Literatūra: Vol. 47 No. 3 (2005): the Classics
-
Магдалена Охняк,
The Motive of Metamorphosis in Victor Pelevin‘s Novel “Omon Ra”
,
Literatūra: Vol. 57 No. 2 (2015): Russian Literature
-
Violeta Katinienė,
Fremdheitserfahrungen am Beispiel der Romane „ Das Provisorium“ (2000) von Wolfgang Hilbig und „Vienos vasaros emigrantai“ (2003) von Valdas Papievis
,
Literatūra: Vol. 59 No. 4 (2017): World Literatures
-
Валентина Брио,
По следам литовского Иерусалима
,
Literatūra: Vol. 54 No. 2 (2012): Russian Literature
-
Rūta Eidukevičienė,
Elfriede’os Jelinek kūrybos recepcija
,
Literatūra: Vol. 47 No. 4 (2005): World Literatures
-
Neringa Klišienė,
La «dramaturgie» épistolaire: les lettres de Sofija Čiurlionienė à sa fille
,
Literatūra: Vol. 57 No. 1 (2015): Lithuanian Literature
-
Roman Timenchik,
The School of Reading Osip Mandelshtam: Readers No. 1, 2, 3
,
Literatūra: Vol. 62 No. 2 (2020): Rusistica Vilnensis
-
Наталья Иванова,
Don Zinzaga and Amaranta (I. Bunin and m. Chekhova)
,
Literatūra: Vol. 60 No. 2 (2018): Russian Literature
-
Jurgita Žana Žana Raškevičiūtė,
Janinos Degutytės ankstyvosios poezijos embleminis kraštovaizdis
,
Literatūra: Vol. 53 No. 1 (2011): Lithuanian Literature