Abstract
In the Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian we find a presentation of a theory of the virtues of eloquence: purity of language (latinitas), clarity (perspicuitas), appropriateness (aptum) and ornament (ornatus). All of them were originated by earlier Greek philosophers Aristotle and Theophrastus. Later this theory was taken on and elaborated by Roman rhetoricians – Cicero and Quintilian. Aristotle in his Rhetoric explicitly identified three of the four virtues (clarity, appropriateness and correctness). Theophrastus created a theory of four virtues of eloquence (correctness, clarity, appropriateness and ornament). His system was adopted by most of others. Dionysius, however, developed the most complex system of virtues. He presented a theory of virtues, which were divided into necessary (purity of language, appropriateness, lucidity and brevity) and accessory ones. The accessory virtues were further subdivided into another three groups. Rhetorica ad Herennium offered a three fold system: elegantia (including both correctness and clarity), compositio (similar to appropriateness) and diginitas (similar to ornament). Basically, in almost all aspects being closer to Cicero (who continues the tradition of Theophrastus), Quintilian is more focused on his theory of eloquence. He discusses the virtues of eloquence very widely and deeply, step by step, drawing a number of examples and including the educational process of an orator. Above all, although the theory of four virtues of Quintilian has been influenced by Ciceron, to some extent in general it does not claim originality and plays a paramount role in modern rhetorics, stylistic and pedagogy.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Антон Нестеров,
Географические карты раннего Нового времени как эстетизация и концептуализация репрезентированного пространства
,
Literatūra: Vol. 57 No. 5 (2015): Special Issue
-
Domininkas Burba,
The Stroll of Miss M** Kr*** (now Mrs. Sk...) or the Surroundings of Vilnius. Published, translated and the foreword written by Domininkas Burba
,
Literatūra: Vol. 60 No. 2 (2018): Russian Literature
-
Vytautas Bikulčius,
Les visages de la mémoire dans le roman de Patrick Modiano «Dans le café de la jeunesse perdue»
,
Literatūra: Vol. 59 No. 4 (2017): World Literatures
-
Skirmantė Šarkauskienė,
Sacra Lithothesis (Consecration of the Stone) by Motiejus Kazimieras Sarbievijus: the Genre Problem
,
Literatūra: Vol. 46 No. 3 (2004): the Classics
-
Dalia Jakaitė,
Literatūros mokslas ir teologija: dialogiško santykio realijos ir krikščioniškos mistinės tradicijos laukas
,
Literatūra: Vol. 53 No. 1 (2011): Lithuanian Literature
-
Velimir Mladenović,
Paul Eluard: Yugoslavian Episode
,
Literatūra: Vol. 62 No. 4 (2020): Literature
-
Šarūnas Šavėla,
The Scope of Philosophical Conceptualisation of Music in Classical Greece
,
Literatūra: Vol. 62 No. 3 (2020): Studies of Ancient Culture and Its Reception
-
Alexander Markov,
Rubens in Russian poetry: from ecfrasis to ideology and vice versa
,
Literatūra: Vol. 61 No. 2 (2019): Russian Literature
-
Anniken Telnes Telnes Iversen,
Towards a polythetic Definition of the Bildungsroman: The Example of Paul Auster’s Moon Palace
,
Literatūra: Vol. 49 No. 5 (2007): Special Issue
-
Giedrė Šmitienė,
The Own Lived Town: Contribution to Personal Identity
,
Literatūra: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2006): Lithuanian Literature