Abstract
In the Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian we find a presentation of a theory of the virtues of eloquence: purity of language (latinitas), clarity (perspicuitas), appropriateness (aptum) and ornament (ornatus). All of them were originated by earlier Greek philosophers Aristotle and Theophrastus. Later this theory was taken on and elaborated by Roman rhetoricians – Cicero and Quintilian. Aristotle in his Rhetoric explicitly identified three of the four virtues (clarity, appropriateness and correctness). Theophrastus created a theory of four virtues of eloquence (correctness, clarity, appropriateness and ornament). His system was adopted by most of others. Dionysius, however, developed the most complex system of virtues. He presented a theory of virtues, which were divided into necessary (purity of language, appropriateness, lucidity and brevity) and accessory ones. The accessory virtues were further subdivided into another three groups. Rhetorica ad Herennium offered a three fold system: elegantia (including both correctness and clarity), compositio (similar to appropriateness) and diginitas (similar to ornament). Basically, in almost all aspects being closer to Cicero (who continues the tradition of Theophrastus), Quintilian is more focused on his theory of eloquence. He discusses the virtues of eloquence very widely and deeply, step by step, drawing a number of examples and including the educational process of an orator. Above all, although the theory of four virtues of Quintilian has been influenced by Ciceron, to some extent in general it does not claim originality and plays a paramount role in modern rhetorics, stylistic and pedagogy.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Zinaida Audzei,
The Chronotopic Structures of E. T. A Hoffmann’s World of Doubles
,
Literatūra: Vol. 57 No. 4 (2015): World Literatures
-
Viktorija Staišiūnaitė,
Literary Hymns and Odes in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania in the 16ᵀᴴ–17ᵀᴴ Centuries: Origins
,
Literatūra: Vol. 57 No. 3 (2015): the Classics
-
Наталья Ковтун,
Uchronia as a Structure Forming Technique in Eugene Vodolazkin’s Novel Aviator
,
Literatūra: Vol. 60 No. 2 (2018): Russian Literature
-
Mindaugas Kvietkauskas,
Preludes of Literary Modernism in Fin-de-siècle Vilnius: Interior Culture and Private Aestheticism Texts
,
Literatūra: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2006): Lithuanian Literature
-
Raminta Gamziukaitė-Mažiulienė,
Naujausioji kritika apie modernistinį diskursą ankstyvuosiuose Knuto Hamsuno romanuose
,
Literatūra: Vol. 46 No. 5 (2004): Special Issue
-
Катажина Сыска,
Современные идиллии. Способы и функции обращения к идиллическому хронотопу в избранных произведениях новейшей русской литературы
,
Literatūra: Vol. 57 No. 5 (2015): Special Issue
-
Emmanuelle Fantin,
Imaginaire nostalgique et publicité: le cas du petit village d’antan
,
Literatūra: Vol. 59 No. 4 (2017): World Literatures
-
Павел Лавринец,
Pavel Kukolnik and Vladimir Nazimov
,
Literatūra: Vol. 59 No. 2 (2017): Russian Literature
-
Даниела Лугарич Вукас,
Коммунальная квартира как гетеротопия
,
Literatūra: Vol. 57 No. 5 (2015): Special Issue
-
Patricia Principalli,
«Autobiographie des objets» de François Bon, ou «Je vous parle d’un temps que les moins de 50 ans ne peuvent pas connaitre...»
,
Literatūra: Vol. 59 No. 4 (2017): World Literatures