Abstract
In the Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian we find a presentation of a theory of the virtues of eloquence: purity of language (latinitas), clarity (perspicuitas), appropriateness (aptum) and ornament (ornatus). All of them were originated by earlier Greek philosophers Aristotle and Theophrastus. Later this theory was taken on and elaborated by Roman rhetoricians – Cicero and Quintilian. Aristotle in his Rhetoric explicitly identified three of the four virtues (clarity, appropriateness and correctness). Theophrastus created a theory of four virtues of eloquence (correctness, clarity, appropriateness and ornament). His system was adopted by most of others. Dionysius, however, developed the most complex system of virtues. He presented a theory of virtues, which were divided into necessary (purity of language, appropriateness, lucidity and brevity) and accessory ones. The accessory virtues were further subdivided into another three groups. Rhetorica ad Herennium offered a three fold system: elegantia (including both correctness and clarity), compositio (similar to appropriateness) and diginitas (similar to ornament). Basically, in almost all aspects being closer to Cicero (who continues the tradition of Theophrastus), Quintilian is more focused on his theory of eloquence. He discusses the virtues of eloquence very widely and deeply, step by step, drawing a number of examples and including the educational process of an orator. Above all, although the theory of four virtues of Quintilian has been influenced by Ciceron, to some extent in general it does not claim originality and plays a paramount role in modern rhetorics, stylistic and pedagogy.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Jadvyga Bajarūnienė,
Franzo Kafkos kūrybos recepcija Lietuvoje (1939–1989)
,
Literatūra: Vol. 53 No. 4 (2011): World Literatures
-
Dovilė Keršienė,
Some Medieval Epistolic Language Features in the Latin Letters of Vytautas the Great
,
Literatūra: Vol. 58 No. 3 (2016): the Classics
-
Justina Petrulionytė,
“Invisible Cities” in the Discourse by Lithuanian Literature Gatekeepers
,
Literatūra: Vol. 57 No. 1 (2015): Lithuanian Literature
-
Irina Beliajeva,
Laughter in the Dark by Vladimir Nabokov: on the Symbiosis of Literature and Opera
,
Literatūra: Vol. 46 No. 4 (2004): World Literatures
-
Audronė Kudulytė-Kairienė,
The Myth of Hylas in Hellenistic Poetry
,
Literatūra: Vol. 54 No. 3 (2012): the Classics
-
Deimantas Valančiūnas,
BHAJI ON THE BEACH: HYBRID IDENTITY AND POPULAR DISCOURSES IN BRITISH DIASPORIC CINEMA
,
Literatūra: Vol. 54 No. 4 (2012): World Literatures
-
Margit Sichert,
The Old and the New: British Concepts of Writing the History of English Literature after Postmodernism
,
Literatūra: Vol. 49 No. 5 (2007): Special Issue
-
Павел Лавринец,
V. I. Samoilo in Russian Periodicals and the Cultural Life of Wilno (1920–1939)
,
Literatūra: Vol. 60 No. 2 (2018): Russian Literature
-
Lina Girdvainytė,
Egypt in Roman Imperial Literature: Tacitus’ Ann. 2.59-61
,
Literatūra: Vol. 57 No. 3 (2015): the Classics
-
Ramunė Bleizgienė,
The Dissemination of Žemaitė’s Literary Fiction in the Education System in 1905–1914
,
Literatūra: Vol. 62 No. 1 (2020): Literature