Abstract
In the Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian we find a presentation of a theory of the virtues of eloquence: purity of language (latinitas), clarity (perspicuitas), appropriateness (aptum) and ornament (ornatus). All of them were originated by earlier Greek philosophers Aristotle and Theophrastus. Later this theory was taken on and elaborated by Roman rhetoricians – Cicero and Quintilian. Aristotle in his Rhetoric explicitly identified three of the four virtues (clarity, appropriateness and correctness). Theophrastus created a theory of four virtues of eloquence (correctness, clarity, appropriateness and ornament). His system was adopted by most of others. Dionysius, however, developed the most complex system of virtues. He presented a theory of virtues, which were divided into necessary (purity of language, appropriateness, lucidity and brevity) and accessory ones. The accessory virtues were further subdivided into another three groups. Rhetorica ad Herennium offered a three fold system: elegantia (including both correctness and clarity), compositio (similar to appropriateness) and diginitas (similar to ornament). Basically, in almost all aspects being closer to Cicero (who continues the tradition of Theophrastus), Quintilian is more focused on his theory of eloquence. He discusses the virtues of eloquence very widely and deeply, step by step, drawing a number of examples and including the educational process of an orator. Above all, although the theory of four virtues of Quintilian has been influenced by Ciceron, to some extent in general it does not claim originality and plays a paramount role in modern rhetorics, stylistic and pedagogy.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Таисия Орал,
Затерянный мир русской поэзии Литвы (по поводу сборника стихотворений Виталия Асовского «Стихи о человеке»)
,
Literatūra: Vol. 58 No. 2 (2016): Russian Literature
-
Liubov Kikhney,
Mandelstam and Heraclitus
,
Literatūra: Vol. 62 No. 2 (2020): Rusistica Vilnensis
-
Aliona Sofija Sofija Ivinskaja,
The Reception of Anna Akhmatova’s Creativity in the Literature of the Lithuanian Exodus (Henrikas Radauskas, Alfonsas Nyka-Niliūnas, Tomas Venclova)
,
Literatūra: Vol. 60 No. 2 (2018): Russian Literature
-
Milda Danytė,
Graphic Novels: a new literary genre in the English-speaking world
,
Literatūra: Vol. 51 No. 4 (2009): World Literatures
-
Vytautas Bikulčius,
LA SALLE DE BAIN DE JEAN-PHILIPPE TOUSSAINT COMME LE ROMAN MINIMALISTE
,
Literatūra: Vol. 54 No. 4 (2012): World Literatures
-
Vaidas Šeferis,
National identity in the Lithuanian biography (Jonas Basanavičius, Jonas Šliūpas, Vincas Kudirka)
,
Literatūra: Vol. 48 No. 5 (2006): Special Issue
-
Monika Voinič,
Plutarch’s attitude towards educated woman (treatises Coniugalia praecepta and Consolatio aduxorem)
,
Literatūra: Vol. 52 No. 3 (2010): the Classics
-
Валентина Брио,
«Осень выдалась теплой, я жил в литве…»
,
Literatūra: Vol. 52 No. 2 (2010): Russian Literature
-
Gražina Kelmelytė,
Translation problems of theological and philosophical concepts in the Gospel according to Philip
,
Literatūra: Vol. 61 No. 3 (2019): Studies of Ancient Culture and Its Reception
-
Corinne Grenouillet,
La révolution espagnole de 1936 dans Pas pleurer de Lydie Salvayre
,
Literatūra: Vol. 60 No. 4 (2018): Studies of Western Literature