Abstract
The paper sets out to discuss character features attributed to Byelorussians, Latvians, Poles, Russians, Germans, i.e. representatives of neighbouring nations or those most prominent in the history of Lithuania as identified in the world outlook of the Lithuanian language. In other words, the paper aims at identifying ethnical stereotypes entrenched in the world outlook of the Lithuanian language. The data includes all collocations with all the words baltarusiškas (-a), latviškas (-a), lenkiškas (-a), rusiškas (-a), vokiškas (-a) in all their forms collected from the Corpus of Contemporary Lithuanian compiled at the Centre of Computer Linguistics of Vytautas Magnus University in Kaunas. The results of the analysis into actual usage have been supplemented by the results of the content analysis of international anecdotes. The methodology of research is based on conceptual analysis.The results of investigation have shown that the closest neighbours are unlikely to be the best known. Representatives of Latvia and Belarus, or countries bordering on Lithuania, have been only fragmentary reflected in the world outlook of the Lithuanian language. Poles, Russians or Germans, the latter are usually not treated as neighbours, are much better known. The language world outlook has identified Polish patriotism and sometimes self-esteem going to the extremes. Russians are thought of as open, ingenuous people whose patriotic feelings might overstep certain boundaries and pose danger. The dominant feature of German national character is their inclination to order, sometimes also rather extreme.Such features might be due to several causes. Russians and Poles make up a large part of the population of national minorities of Lithuania, which is why they are seen as slightly closer. On the other hand, Lithuania is historically related to Poland, Russia and Germany.The language world outlook tends to provide more details on negative features. The tendency also applies when discussing the national character of representatives of other nations. Most outstanding features are verbalised hyperbolically and ironically.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Dalia Pakalniškienė,
Derivation of verbs attested in the old Lithuanian scripts: infixed and sta-stem anticausatives
,
Lietuvių kalba: No. 15 (2020): Lietuvių kalba
-
Audrius Valotka,
The role of the addressee’s creativity in interpreting allusions
,
Lietuvių kalba: No. 10 (2016)
-
Agnė Lisauskaitė,
Constructions with the verb EITI ‘to go’ in the 16th century Lithuanian writings
,
Lietuvių kalba: No. 15 (2020): Lietuvių kalba
-
Vitas Labutis,
Kalbėtojo funkcinės gramatikos įvadas
,
Lietuvių kalba: No. 1 (2007)
-
Elena Riekhakaynen,
Lithuanian spoken corpora and studies of first language acquisition: a view from outside
,
Lietuvių kalba: No. 13 (2019): Lietuvių kalba
-
Bronius Maskuliūnas,
Some spelling and language features of publicistic works by Povilas Višinskis
,
Lietuvių kalba: No. 15 (2020): Lietuvių kalba
-
Danutė Valentukevičienė,
Reflexive verbs of the environs of Kabeliai
,
Lietuvių kalba: No. 13 (2019): Lietuvių kalba
-
Eglė Vaivadaitė-Kaidi,
Conseptual metaphors of ʽparadiseʼ in the translation of the Quran by Sigitas Geda
,
Lietuvių kalba: No. 5 (2011)
-
Greta Maslauskienė,
Combinatory potential of contrastive discourse markers in English and Lithuanian: a semantic functional analysis
,
Lietuvių kalba: No. 14 (2020): Lietuvių kalba
-
Laura Geržotaitė,
Research of the images of standard Lithuanian in an area of the standard language: the case of Kaunas district gymnasium
,
Lietuvių kalba: No. 13 (2019): Lietuvių kalba