How Does Themis Weigh Drugs? Peculiarities of the Legal Regulation of the Determination of Quantities of Some Narcotic and Psychotropic Substances in Lithuania
Articles
Mindaugas Lankauskas
Law Institute of the Lithuanian Centre for Social Sciences
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5688-4971
Published 2023-12-28
https://doi.org/10.15388/CrimLithuan.2023.11.3
PDF
HTML

Keywords

threshold quantities for drugs
psychoactive substances
narcotic and psychotropic substances
drug offences
threshold quantities for drugs; psychoactive substances; narcotic and psychotropic substances; drug offences; drug control

How to Cite

Lankauskas, M. (2023) “How Does Themis Weigh Drugs? Peculiarities of the Legal Regulation of the Determination of Quantities of Some Narcotic and Psychotropic Substances in Lithuania”, Kriminologijos studijos, 11, pp. 80–98. doi:10.15388/CrimLithuan.2023.11.3.

Abstract

This article delves into the legal framework concerning threshold quantities for drug offences in Lithuania and examines the potential implications of this regulation on criminal liability. It initiates by scrutinizing criminal liability for drug offences in Lithuania, with an emphasis on the legal significance of the type and quantity of specific substances. It is worth noting that existing legal acts lack defined criteria for determining small, large, or very large quantities of the narcotic and psychotropic substances. Nevertheless, the legal qualification of criminal activities and associated penalties is contingent upon the specific quantity of the drug. Furthermore, certain quantities stipulated in the Recommendations for determining small, large, and very large quantities of narcotic and psychotropic substances have raised concerns about their alignment with the latest scientific findings and empirical evidence. In light of these concerns, there is a compelling need for a review of these recommendations, guided by clearly defined and evidence-based criteria. Until such a review is conducted, the deficiencies in the existing legal regulations could be partially mitigated if courts, within the discretion granted to them, proactively exceed the quantity limits established by the recommendations.

PDF
HTML
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles in this journal

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 > >>