[full article and abstract in English]
The goal of this article is to analyse the alternation between the genitive and nominative cases in Latvian. As the alternation between genitive and nominative cases is possible in all clauses in which the verb būt ‘to be’ is used as an independent verb, this article examines existential, locative, and also possessive clauses, while also demonstrating that distinguishing these clause types is problematic for Latvian utilising the criteria given in the linguistic literature. Clauses containing the negative form of būt ‘to be’, i.e. nebūt, form the foundation of those selected for this study, as only in these sentences the genitive/nominative alternation can be seen for the subject in Latvian.
There are only fragmentary descriptions of existential clauses as a unique semantic type, primarily in connection with the function of the verb būt ‘to be’ and the problems associated with distinguishing its independent and auxiliary meanings. Word order in existential, locative, and possessive clauses has, until now, been examined in connection with typical clause expanders – adverbial modifiers and the dative of possession as well as the information structure of the clause. At the same time, case choice for objects in negative existential clauses has traditionally been one of the most studied themes regarding language standardisation. In order to determine which factors affect the choice of either the genitive or nominative case, a corpus study was done analysing 979 examples: 882 with a genitive subject and 97 with a nominative subject.
It was found that a connection exists between the definiteness of the subject, word order, and case choice; however, this manifests only as a tendency rather than as a strict rule.
Ahero, Antonija, Anna Bergmane, Aina Blinkena, Rūdolfs Grabis, Milda Lepika, Rita Melbikse, Aina Miķelsone, Tamāra Porīte, Mērija Saule-Sleine. 1959. Mūsdienu latviešu literārās valodas gramatika. I. [A grammar of Modern Standard Latvian]. Rīga: LPSR Zinātņu akadēmijas izdevniecība.
Bentley, Delia. 2015. Existentials and locatives in Romance dialects of Italy: introduction. In Existentials and locatives in Romance dialects of Italy. Bentley, Delia, Ciconte, Francesco Maria & Silvio Cruschina, eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198745266.003.0001
Berg-Olsen, Sturla. 2005. The Latvian dative and genitive: a cognitive grammar account. Oslo: University of Oslo.
Bondarko, Aleksandr, ed. 1996. Teorija funkcional'noj grammatiki. Lokativnost'. Bytijnost'. Posessivnost'. Obuslovlennost'. [Theory of functional grammar. Space. Existence. Possession. Conditionality]. Sankt-Peterburg: Nauka.
Creissels, Denis. 2014. Existential predication in typological perspective. Available at: http://www.deniscreissels.fr/public/Creissels-Exist.Pred.pdf
Endzelīns, Jānis, Kārlis Mīlenbahs. 1939. Latviešu valodas mācība. [A textbook of
Holvoet, Axel. 2005. Intranzitivinių sakinių tipai: egzistenciniai, lokatyviniai ir posesyviniai sakiniai. [The types of intransitive clauses: existential, locative and possessive clauses]. In Gramatinių funkcijų tyrimai. [Studies of grammatical functions]. Axel Holvoet & Rolandas Mikulskas, eds. Vilnius: Lietuviu kalbos institutas. 139–160.
Holvoet, Axel. 2011. The Baltic languages. In The languages and linguistics of Europe. A comprehensive guide. Volume 1. Bernd Kortmann & Johan van der Auwera, eds. Berlin / Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110220261.3
Holvoet, Axel & Marta Grzybowska. 2014. Non-canonical grammatical relations in a modal construction. In Grammatical relations and their non-canonical encoding in Baltic. Axel Holvoet & Nicole Nau, eds. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 97–135. https://doi.org/10.1075/vargreb.1.03hol
Kalėdaitė, Violeta. 2002. Existential sentences in English and Lithuanian. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Kalėdaitė, Violeta. 2012. The specifying existential sentence type in Lithuanian: a problem statement. In Multiple perspectives in linguistic research on Baltic
Kalnača, Andra. 2002. Concurrence of Case Forms – Lapse or Norm in Standard Latvian.
Kalnača, Andra. 2007. Ģenitīva sinonīmijas stilistiskās funkcijas mūsdienu latviešu valodā. [The stylistic functions of genitive in Modern Latvian]. Acta humanitarica universitatis Saulensis 3, 68–78.
Kalnača, Andra. 2014. A Typological Perspective on Latvian Grammar. Warsaw/Berlin: De Gruyter Open. https://doi.org/10.2478/9783110411317
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria & Bernhard Wälhli. 2001. The Circum-Baltic languages. An areal-typological approach. In Circum-Baltic Languages. Vol. 2. Grammar and Typology. Östen Dahl & Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm, eds. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 615–750. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.55.15kop
Lagzdiņa, Sarmīte. 1997. Verbs nebūt morfoloģiskajā paradigmā un teikumā. [The verb nebūt 'not to be' in the sentence and its morphological paradigm]. In Savai valodai. [To our language]. Aina Blinkena, ed. Rīga: Latviešu valodas institūts. 165–200.
Leinonen, Marja. 2016. Partitives and genitives in negated sentences in Finnish, Latvian and Lithuanian. In Valoda: nozīme un forma 7. Andra Kalnača & Ilze Lokmane, eds. Rīga: LU Akadēmiskais apgāds. 89–103.
Leonetti, Manuel. 2008. Definiteness effects and the role of the coda in existential constructions. In Essays on Nominal Determination: From morphology to discourse management. Henrik H. Müller & Alex Klinge, eds. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 131–162. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.99.09leo
Lyons, John. 1968. Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165570
Metslang, Helena. 2012. On the Case Marking of Existential Subjects in Estonian. SKY Journal of Linguistics 25, 161–204.
Metslang, Helena. 2013. Grammatical relations in Estonian: subject, object and beyond.
Myler, Neil. 2014. Building and interpreting possession sentences. [PhD dissertation].
Nītiņa, Daina & Juris Grigorjevs, eds. 2013. Latviešu valodas gramatika. [A grammar of Latvian]. Rīga: LU Latviešu valodas institūts.
Paducheva, Elena. 2008. Locative and Existential Meaning of Russian byt'. Russian Linguistics 32 (3), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11185-008-9027-2
Partee, Barbara & Vladimir Borschev. 2007. Existential Sentences, BE, and the Genitive of Negation in Russian. In Existence: Semantics and Syntax. Ileana Comorovski & Klaus von Heusinger, eds. Dordrrecht: Springer. 147–190.