Abstract
[full article, abstract in English; abstract in Lithuanian]
Authenticity is a fundamental issue for the long-term preservation of digital objects; however, the validation of authenticity is a complex task – it requires the representation of provenance as a precondition for trust. For that matter, it is crucial to define the key conceptual elements that provide the foundation for such a complex framework. The main objective of this paper is to define how authenticity has to be managed in the digital preservation process: to identify the semantic units needed to support core preservation functions in order to ensure the trustworthiness of digital objects and ensure interoperability – i.e., the ability to exchange data between institutions. This paper presents results from the first stage of the research: the scope of authenticity and provenance content needed to support core preservation functions and ensure interoperability – the ability to exchange data between institutions and assess the added value of the Europeana and VEPIS regarding authenticity and provenance based on the adequacy of analyzed international models for authenticity and provenance.
Methodology: by applying the EU 2–3–6 concept of added value for electronic publishing and qualitative content analysis of research literature, we conceptualized the Content Creation Process, which refers to the structure and meaning of authenticity and provenance. This approach enabled us to identify the scope of the content of authenticity and provenance.
References
APARSEN (2012). D24.1 Report on Authenticity and Plan for Interoperable Authenticity Evaluation System. http://www.alliancepermanentaccess.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/downloads/2014/06/APARSEN-REP-D24_1-01-2_5_incURN.pdf
BUNEMAN, Peter, SANJEV Khanna and WANG-CHIEV Tan. Why and Were: A Characterization of Data Provenance, https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1209&context=cis_papers.
CAPLAN, P. (2009). Understanding PREMIS. https://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/understanding-premis.pdf
CCSDS – Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems. (2012). Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS). https://web.archive.org/web/20131020200910/http://public.ccsds.org/publications/archive/650x0m2.pdf
CHARLES, V., Isaac, A. (2015). Enhancing the Europeana Data Model (EDM). https://pro.europeana.eu/files/Europeana_Professional/Publications/EDM_WhitePaper_17062015.pdf.
CRMdig: Model for provenance metadata. Version 3.2.1, April, 2016, http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl/CRMext/CRMdig/docs/CRMdig_v3.2.1.pdf.
DAPPERT, A., ENDERS, M. (2010). Digital Preservation Metadata Standards, In ISO: Information Standards Quarterly, 22:2 (2010): 5-13, http://www.niso.org/apps/group_public/download.php/4299/isqv22no2.pdf.
DLM Forum Foundation (2011). Modular Requirements for Records Systems (MoReq2010). https://www.moreq.info/files/moreq2010_vol1_v1_1_en.pdf
DOERR, M. (2009). An Ontological Approach to Digital Preservation Metadata. ICS-FORTH May 23, 2009. http://ww.cidoc-crm.org/sites/default/files/carpar_for_Prague.ppt
DOERR, M., Theodoridou, M. (2011). CRMdig: A Generic Digital Provenance Model for Scientific Observation, in 3rd USENIX Workshop on the Theory and Practice of Provenance (TaPP ‘11).
DROGE, E., et al. (2015). DM2E, ICP-PSP-297274, Digitised Manuscripts to Europeana, Technical specification. https://dm2e.eu/files/DM2E_Model_V1.2.pdf
European Commission, DG XIII, Andersen Consulting, (1996). Strategic Developments for the European Publishing Industry towards the Year 2000. http://www.echo.lu/elpub2/en/exengl.pdf
Europeana (2013). Europeana Data Model Primer. https://pro.europeana.eu/files/Europeana_Professional/Share_your_data/Technical_requirements/EDM_Documentation/EDM_Primer_130714.pdf
Europeana (2017). Definition of the Europeana Data Model v5.2.8 06/10/2017. At: https://pro.europeana.eu/files/Europeana_Professional/Share_your_data/Technical_requirements/EDM_Documentation//EDM_Definition_v5.2.8_102017.pdf
Europeana (2017). Europeana Data Model – Mapping Guidelines v2.4. https://pro.europeana.eu/files/Europeana_Professional/Share_your_data/Technical_requirements/EDM_Documentation/EDM_Mapping_Guidelines_v2.4_102017.pdf
Europeana (2013). Extending the Europeana Licencing Framework. https://pro.europeana.eu/post/extending-the-europeana-licensing-framework
FACTOR, M., HENIS, E., NAOR, D., RABINOVICI-COHEN, S., RESHEF, P., RONEN, S. (2009). Authenticity and provenance in long term Digital preservation: modeling and implementation in preservation aware storage. http://usenix.org/event/tapp09/tech/full_papers/factor/factor_html/
GAVRILIS, D. DALLAS, C., ANGELIS, S. (2013). A Curation-Oriented Thematic Aggregator. In: Aalberg T., Papatheodorou C., Dobreva M., Tsakonas G., Farrugia C.J. (eds) Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries. TPDL 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8092, https://
doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40501-3_13
GIARETTA, D. (2011). Advanced Digital Preservation. Springer Heidelberg Dordrecht London New York e-ISBN 978-3-642-16809-3. DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-16809-3
GROTH, P. et al. (2012). Requirements for Provenance on the Web. In International Journal of Digital Curation, Vol. 7, No. 1, https://www.isi.edu/~gil/papers/groth-etal-ijdc12.pdf
GUERCIO, M., SALZA, (2012). Managing Authenticity through the Digital Resource Lifecycle. In Italian Research Conference on Digital Libraries IRCDL 2012: Digital Libraries and Archives pp. 249–260, 2013. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-35834-0_25
InterPARES 3 Project (2009). InterPARES 2 Project Chain of Preservation (COP) Model Metadata. http://www.interpares.org/ip2/display_file.cfm?doc=ip2_cop-model_metadata_v1.0.pdf
InterPARES 3 Project, TEAM Canada (2016). General Study 15 – Application Profile For Authenticity Metadata: General study Report. V.2.3. http://www.interpares.org/ip3/display_file.cfm?doc=ip3_canada_gs15_final_report.pdf
International Organization for Standardization (2016). ISO 15489-1:2016. Information and documentation – Records management. https://www.iso.org/standard/62542.html
LAMB, D., PRANDONI, C., DACIDSON, J., DCC (2009). http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/briefing-papers/technology-watch-papers/caspar
MOREAU, L. et al. (2011). The Open Provenance Model Core Specification (v1.1), In Future Generation Computer Systems, Vol. 27 (2), Issue 6. P. 743–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2010.07.005
National Archives of Australia (2008). Australian Government Recordkeeping Metadata Standard version 2.0. http://www.naa.gov.au/information-management/managing-information-and-records/describing/metadata/AGRKMS/index.aspx
PREMIS Editorial Committee (2015). PREMIS Data Dictionary for Preservation Metadata. Version 3.0. http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/v3/premis-3-0-final.pdf
ROGERS, C. A literature review of authenticity of records in digital systems from ‘machine-readable’ to records in the cloud (2016). http://oaji.net/articles/2017/3932-1484337719.pdf
TENNIS, J. T., ROGERS, C. (2012). Authenticity Metadata and the IPAM: Progress toward the InterPARES Application Profile. In Proc. Int’l Conf. on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications. The Kuching Proceedings. http://dcpapers.dublincore.org/pubs/article/view/3662
The InterPARES 2 Project Dictionary (2018). http://www.interpares.org/ip2/display_file.cfm?
doc=ip2_dictionary.pdf&CFID=15051643&CFTOKEN=77329071
VEPIS Techninis aprašymas (Specifikacija) (2014). Nr.V2.0.
W3C (2013). Provenance Working Group, https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Main_Page
W3C (2013). PROV-O: The PROV Ontology, W3C Recommendation 30 April 2013. https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-prov-o-20130430/#description-starting-point-terms
W3C Provenance Incubator Group (2015). Overview of Provenance on the Web. https://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/images/0/02/Provenance-XG-Overview.pdf
