Changes of Alcohol Control Law in Online Media: A Case Study
Articles
Vaida Kalinkaitė
Mykolas Romeris University
Published 2018-12-28
https://doi.org/10.15388/Im.2018.82.4
PDF

Keywords

alcohol control law in Lithuania
news framing
agenda setting theory
alcohol control law in media

How to Cite

Kalinkaitė, V. (2018). Changes of Alcohol Control Law in Online Media: A Case Study. Information & Media, 82, 50-68. https://doi.org/10.15388/Im.2018.82.4

Abstract

[full article and abstract in Lithuanian; abstract in English]

Political science and mass communication studies have proven long ago that media outlets can affect public opinion. This is especially important when political choices are made. The media can determine how the public will react to changes. In our case, we delve into a potential threat of a biased public opinion (favorable to certain business subjects, politicians or others parties) being formed. This relates to the media outlets or organizations stepping over the boundaries of ethics for a chance to make a profit from certain interested individuals, organizations or companies.

This study addresses the problem of how the changes in the legislation of alcohol control have been reflected in the Lithuanian online newspapers 15min.lt, Delfi.lt and Lrytas.lt. Our study object pertains to how the changes in the law of alcohol control are being reflected. The aim of this article is to examine how these changes of law have been reflected in Lithuanian media.

A qualitative case study was conducted using content analysis. The results of the research show that the abovementioned Lithuanian online newspapers reflected a rather one-sided evaluation of the law changes. Most of the changes were reflected in a negative way; there were more negative than positive publications informing about the changes.

Although similar tendencies have been identified in all the online newspapers, Lrytas.lt happened to stand out. There were publications that had no clear sources of information; the authors of the publications were not mentioned as well. Furthermore, there were publications criticizing not the changes themselves but certain members of the parliament. The appliance of ethical norms was deemed to be more characteristic of Delfi.lt and 15min.lt.

PDF

References

LITERATŪRA

ALEKNONIS, Gintaras (2011). Naujoji cenzūra. Vilnius: Mykolo Romerio universiteto leidybos centras. 224 p. ISBN 9789955192947.
BALČYTIENĖ, Auksė (2000). Žiniasklaidos tekstai. Darbai ir dienos, Nr. 24, p. 109–119. Prieiga per internetą: <http://donelaitis.vdu.lt/publikacijos/balcytiene.pdf>.
BERTRAND, Claude-Jean (2002). Media ethics and accountability systems. London: Transaction Publishers. 164 p. ISBN 9781351289627.
CLEMENTE, Marco; GABBIONETA, Claudia (2017). How does the media frame corporate scandals? The case of German newspapers and the Volkswagen Diesel scandal. Journal of Management Inquiry, vol. 26(3), p. 187–302. doi: 10.1177/1056492616689304.
DENISENKO, Viktoras (2016). Rusijos periodinės spaudos požiūris į Baltijos šalis geopolitinių pokyčių kontekste (1991–2009) (daktaro disertacija). Prieiga per internetą: <https://epublications.vu.lt/object/elaba:15438114/>.
DONAUSKAITĖ, Džina (2015). Žiniasklaidos vaidmuo skurdo mažinimo politikoje: Lietuvos interneto dienraščių 2008 m. ekonominės krizės metu atvejis (daktaro disertacija). Prieiga per internetą: <https://epublications.vu.lt/object/elaba:8281480/>.
DU, Ying Roselin (2012). Intermedia agenda-setting in the age of globalization: A multinational agenda-setting test. Global Media and Communication, vol. 9 (1), p. 19–36. doi: 10.1177/1742766512463038.
ENTMAN, Robert (1993). Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Prieiga per internetą: <https://www.unc.edu/~fbaum/teaching/articles/J-Communication-1993-Entman.pdf>.
GOFFMAN, Erving (1974). Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. Prieiga per internetą: <https://is.muni.cz/el/1423/podzim2013/SOC571E/um/E.Goffman-FrameAnalysis.pdf>.
KUEHN, Kathleen M. (2017). Framing mass surveillance: Analyzing New Zealand’s media coverage of the early Snowden files. Journalism, vol. 19(2), p. 1–18. doi: 10.1177/1464884917699238.
LASSWELL, Harold (1948). The structure and function of communication in society. Prieiga per internetą: <http://pracownik.kul.pl/files/37108/public/Lasswell.pdf>.
Lietuvos visuomenės informavimo etikos kodeksas (2016). Prieiga per internetą: <http://www.etikoskomisija.lt/teisine-informacija/etikos-kodeksas/item/69-lietuvos-visuomenes-informavimo-etikos-kodeksas>.
MATTHES, Jorg (2012). Framing politics: an integrative approach. American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 56 (3), p. 247–259. doi: 10.1177/0002764211426324.
MAŽYLĖ, Jolanta (2012). Atsakingos žiniasklaidos sistemos: teorinės prieigos ir situacija Lietuvos regionų spaudoje. Žurnalistikos tyrimai, Nr. 5, p. 126–144. Prieiga per internetą: <http://www.zurnalai.vu.lt/zurnalistikos-tyrimai/article/view/1803>.
MAŽYLĖ, Jolanta (2012). Viešosios informacijos rengėjų teisės ir pareigos. In Medijos, žiniasklaida, žurnalistika tradicinėje ir tinklaveikos visuomenėje. Vilnius: Vilniaus universiteto leidykla, p. 86–89. ISBN 978-609-459-083-2.
MCCOMBS, Maxwell (2005). A look at agenda-setting: past, present and future. Journalism Studies, vol. 6, p. 543–557. doi: 10.1080/14616700500250438.
MCCOMBS, Maxwell; SHAW, Donald (1972). vol. 36 (2), p. 176–187. doi: 10.1086/267990.
MERRILL, John Callhoun (1997). Journalism ethics: philosophical foundations for news media. New York: St. Marins’s Press. 248 p. ISBN 9780312138998.
NABAŽAITĖ, Erika (2017). Emigracijos diskurso rėminimas Lietuvos interneto dienraščiuose. Informacijos mokslai, t. 78, p. 162–173. Prieiga per internetą: <http://www.zurnalai.vu.lt/informacijos-mokslai/article/view/10840>.
PALMER, Anthony; TANNER, Andrea (2012). Booms, bailouts, and blame: news framing of the 2008 economic collapse. Electronic News, vol. 6(3), p. 151–170. doi: 10.1177/1931243112456532.
PENNINGTON, Rosemary (2016). When new media make news: framing technology and sexual assault in the Steubenville rape case. New Media & Society, vol. 18(11), p. 2435–2451. doi: 10.1177/1461444815612407.
ROGERS, Everett; DEARING, James (1988). Agenda-setting research: where has it been, where is it going? Communication Yearbook, vol. 11, p. 555–594. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1988.11678708.
Svetainių lankomumas (2017). Prieiga per internetą: <https://opa.gemius.lt/>.
VALENTINAVIČIUS, Virginijus (2016). Deficit of trust and the decline of print media in Lithuania. Journalism Research, vol. 10, p. 5–20. Prieiga per internetą: <http://www.zurnalai.vu.lt/zurnalistikos-tyrimai/article/view/10696>.
VAN HULST, Merlijn; YANOW, Dvora (2016). From policy “frames” to “framing”: theorizing a more dynamic, political approach. American Review of Public Administration, vol. 46(1), p. 92–112. doi: 10.1177/0275074014533142.

Teisės aktai
Lietuvos Respublikos alkoholio kontrolės įstatymo Nr. I-857 2, 16, 161, 17, 18, 22, 28, 29 ir 34 straipsnių pakeitimo įstatymas (2017). TAR, 2017-06-09,
Nr. 9774.
Lietuvos Respublikos visuomenės informavimo įstatymas (2006). Valstybės žinios, Nr. 82-3254.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.