Prediction of Poor Outcome Using the Urea to Albumin Ratio in Thoracic Empyema
Research papers
Evgeni Dimitrov
Department of Surgical Diseases, University Hospital "Prof. Dr. Stoyan Kirkovich", Stara Zagora, Bulgaria
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8888-9702
Daniel Valchev
Clinic of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital “Prof. Dr. Stoyan Kirkovich” Stara Zagora, Bulgaria
Georgi Minkov
Department of Surgical Diseases, University Hospital “Prof. Dr. Stoyan Kirkovich” Stara Zagora, Bulgaria
Emil Enchev
Department of Surgical Diseases, University Hospital “Prof. Dr. Stoyan Kirkovich” Stara Zagora, Bulgaria
Yovcho Yovtchev
Department of Surgical Diseases, University Hospital “Prof. Dr. Stoyan Kirkovich” Stara Zagora, Bulgaria
Published 2024-05-24
https://doi.org/10.15388/Amed.2024.31.1.21
PDF
HTML

Keywords

empyema
pleural infection
urea
albumin
urea to albumin ratio
UAR
mortality

How to Cite

1.
Dimitrov E, Valchev D, Minkov G, Enchev E, Yovtchev Y. Prediction of Poor Outcome Using the Urea to Albumin Ratio in Thoracic Empyema. AML [Internet]. 2024 May 24 [cited 2024 Jul. 17];31(1):86-94. Available from: https://www.journals.vu.lt/AML/article/view/34413

Abstract

Purpose: The prognostic performance of urea-to-albumin ratio (UAR) has been assessed in various pulmonary and nonpulmonary conditions, but never in thoracic empyema. Therefore, our aim was to determine whether this marker has the ability to predict outcome in such patients.
Methods: A single-center retrospective study was conducted in a Clinic of Thoracic Surgery at a University Hospital between January 2021 and October 2023. A total of 84 patients who underwent emergency surgery due to thoracic empyema were involved. Serum levels of urea and albumin at admission were used to calculate UAR. We analyzed area under receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curves of UAR, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and quick-sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA), and compared their prognostic performance.
Results: 
The identified in-hospital mortality was 10.7%. The UAR showed the best ability to prognosticate mortality compared to qSOFA (AUROC = 0.828 vs 0.747) and SIRS (AUROC = 0.828 vs 0.676). We established a sensitivity of 87.5% and specificity of 74.2% at optimal cut-off value UAR > 51.1 for prediction of adverse outcome.
Conclusion: In patients with thoracic empyema urea-to-albumin ratio showed significant prognostic performance and a potential for clinical application as a low cost and widely available predictor of death.

PDF
HTML
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 44 45 46 47 48 49