Abstract
The article proposes the survey of the attempts to reconstruct the theoretical core in Weber’s sociological work notorious for its ambiguity in this respect. The work on reconstruction of this core reflects as in the mirror the major shifts in the agenda of contemporary sociology. The confrontation of the system functionalism and conflict sociology during the first post-war decades Jed to “translation wars” in the USA and gave rise to two competing images of Weber – a theorist of social order painted by T. Parsons and as “bourgeois Marx” defended by H. Gerth, C. W. Mills, R. Collins. The renascence of sociological evolutionism in the 1960’s made central the question about the status of Weber’s work on Western rationalism and rationalisation. The two extreme opposing standpoints in this discussion were represented by the vision of Weber as historist (R. Bendix, G. Roth) and as multilinear culturalist evolutionist (F. H. Tenbruck) while W. Schluchter tried to mediate in this conflict seeing Weber’s work as Jed by “minimalist” evolutionist research program. In all interpretations abovementioned Weber is conceived as a macrosociological theorist whose substantive work stands in tension with his methodological and programmatic texts containing the concept of interpretative sociology, the outline of action theory and advocacy of the methodological individualism. Because of this part of his work Weber was identified (mainly by efforts of A. Schütz) as a progenitor of interpretative sociology too. Coming to prominence in the 1960’s and 1970’s interpretative sociology shifted the focus of theoretical discussion in social theory to the relations between the structure and agency and those between the micro and macro dimensions in social reality. However it was not capable to solve theoretical problems related to those topics. As a new promising theoretical framework for the solution of these problems rational choice approach confronts too the task to come to terms with the work of Max Weber because the history of interpretations of his work teaches us one important lesson: The capability to account for his work providing its assessment and rational reconstruction (if possible in its totality) is an important test of viability for each new approach aspiring for dominance in social theory.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Zenonas Norkus,
Rational Action in the Sociology of Max Weber and in the Rational Choice Theory
,
Problemos: Vol. 57 (2000): Problemos
-
Zenonas Norkus,
Sociology of Rationalism: M. Weber vs. K. Marx
,
Problemos: Vol. 43 (1990): Problemos
-
Zenonas Norkus,
The Problem of Value Neutrality of Science in the 20th Century Philosophy (Max Weber, Analytical Philosophy of Science and Metathics, Critical Theory)
,
Problemos: Vol. 59 (2001): Problemos
-
Zenonas Norkus,
Akrasia and Self in Egonomics
,
Problemos: Vol. 58 (2000): Problemos
-
Zenonas Norkus,
On Positive and Negative Altruism
,
Problemos: Vol. 47 (1995): Problemos
-
Zenonas Norkus,
KOOPERACIJA PRIEŠ RINKOS IR VALDŽIOS NESĖKMES, ARBA KAIP ANKSČIAU LAIKO SUKURTI GERĄ KAPITALIZMĄ
,
Problemos: Vol. 82 (2012): Problemos
-
Zenonas Norkus,
On A. Smith, A. Meinong, and Contemplative Altruism
,
Problemos: Vol. 46 (1994): Problemos
-
Zenonas Norkus,
Postmodernism in the Theory of History: The Rhetorical Tradition and Hayden White’s Theory of the Historiographical Style
,
Problemos: Vol. 50 (1996): Problemos
-
Zenonas Norkus,
APIE ATEINANČIĄ SINTETINĖS BIOLOGIJOS KONDRATJEVO BANGĄ IR BIOKAPITALISTINĘ LIETUVĄ
,
Problemos: Vol. 81 (2012): Problemos
-
Zenonas Norkus,
New Books for Those Who are Learning
,
Problemos: Vol. 64 (2003): Problemos